I’ve been knee deep in webhosts all day.  My Mom owns a children’s store in my hometown and for the longest time I’ve tried to convince her to take it online.  She finally decided to listen and has been really excited about it.   I bought her a domain name about a month ago and she said she was a go with it all so I purchased a starter plan via 1&1 Hosting (who this one is through) and started setting everything up.

I know nothing about e-commerce sites, so I went with WordPress and an e-commerce plugin that was available for it.  It was pretty nice and looked like it would suffice, but 1&1 really sucks when it comes to resources.  I found that after installing that plugin, I pretty much was limited to nothing else.  Memory usage was maxed and doing simple tasks resulted in continuous displays of the  Internal Server Error 500 page.

So, enough was enough and I’ve decided to transfer the domain to InMotion Hosting which rated very high on many webhosting review sites for business purposes.  Only problem is that I have to wait 60 days from the time of domain registration for it to begin the transfer process.  The 60 day mark is February 2nd, so not too bad.  Hopefully it won’t take too long to actually transfer.

This also gave me a chance to look into dedicated storefront software and I was surprised to find so many free options.  I looked at Magento, osCommerce, Mal’s e-Commerce, VirtueMart, Zen-Cart and others.  I finally found one I really like for her in Prestashop.  It’s pretty simple, but has a nice interface and I don’t think the admin panel will overwhelm her.  It also seems to have all the options I can ever imagine her needing…even if it does better than I expect (I hope it makes her millions, but I have to be a little realistic at first).

Anyway, that’s what I’m doing right now as I wait for Prestashop to upload via FTP.  After it gets off the ground, I’ll post the link and you can all buy your kids some new clothes.

 

It’s the sound of a spinning 2TB Western Digital Caviar.  WD announced their new offering in a press conference yesterday.

The drive has a 32MB cache buffer and operates on 4x500GB platters.  Formatted NTFS on a Windows box you’ll see 1.81TB of new space.  Current suggested MSRP is slated for $299.  A review can be found here (I have no association with this site and am only providing the link for your own enjoyment…I can’t vouch for their findings).

Well, I can’t really afford much more than another 1TB drive right now, but those can be found for around $89 locally for me, so I don’t see much point in spending $300 on something twice that size.  Especially when I’ll need two of them to benefit me with unRAID.  I’ll wait a bit and we’ll probably see it at half that price in 3 months.

 

I’ve not had any issues with the cache performance, for the most part, in Media Browser, but I’ve wondered if cache performance would be affected if it were located on different media types.  I had already tried a network location for certain parts of the cache so that I could “universalize” my watched ticks, but it didn’t work out too well.  OK, it didn’t work out at all.

I’ve also tried a few of my flash media drives in hopes that the better access speeds may make a difference, but I found that it lead to much slower load times, so I scratched that idea also.  However, the flash media experiment did give me another idea – RAM disks.  I had used RAM disks with MyMovies to store the database and images before it started using a SQL backend and it worked wonderfully.  I still used it for images after that and it did help.  I figure it couldn’t hurt to try for the Cache directory for MediaBrowser, so I had my next little project.

I had a copy of SuperSpeed RAMDisk, but unfortunately for me, it did not include Vista support.  Suck.  I turned to the Internet and found a nice freeware RAMDisk (with GUI) here.  It’s very nice, although it doesn’t include a save-on-shutdown feature.  I’m going to look into the command line for it to see if I can create a batch file to schedule to do that on a daily basis for me.  Otherwise, I’ll just manually create a cache image when I think of it.  I’m doing this on my son’s HTPC and his cache doesn’t change so drastically that it would be a problem anyway.

I ran the included application and installed the RAMDisk driver.  After a minute or so, I was good to go.  I set a RAMDisk emulation of a fixed disk to 256MB, hit Apply and I had a new X: to play with.  I then browser to C:\ProgramData\MediaBrowser, cut my Cache folder and pasted it directly to my newly created RAMDisk (X:).  I then fired up the command line (CMD from Run prompt), changed my path to C:\ProgramData\MediaBrowser and created a new NTFS junction pointing to the X:\Cache folder:

C:\ProgramData\MediaBrowser>mklink /J Cache X:\Cache

I was greeted with a success message and I was all ready to fire up Media Browser.  I decided to clear my cache so that I could see if there was anything to gain there and I did notice that my collection populated a little quicker.  The increased transfer rate and decreased access times definitely seemed snappier to me.  My son’s system is only a Pentium D on a single channel memory platform and an old PATA IBM 80GB HDD, so it was a bit laggy.  What I witnessed was no fluke…populating the cache and subsequent browsing was much smoother for me.

I can’t say that this will do much for faster systems, but if you’ve got an HTPC that barely meets the mark for Vista, this could certainly help.  It really doesn’t require much to setup and once you get things setup the way you want and your cache set well, saving an image to load after reboots won’t be much of a hassle.  Hopefully there is something in the command switches that allows it to be loaded automatically upon reboot.  We’ll see.

I’m going to trial some X64 RAMDisk software in the next bit to see what it does for my test system.  I’ll also be trying this out on my faster HTPCs to see if there is any improvement.  I’ll update later on what I come up with.

If you decide to try this yourself, let me know how it goes.


UPDATE:

I found a free public beta of another RAMDisk software that supports startup-to-image and save-image-on-shutdown features.  I don’t see any indication of it expiring, although I’m sure the non-beta will not be free.  So far, it works very well and is what I plan to use on my remaining HTPCs.  It supports both x86 and x64 systems.

Download is here.


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser