Below is my actual back and forth with a kind of famous black “conservative.†Let’s call him Collab, my attempt at cute for Collaborator. That’s been abbreviated to TC in the text. I initiated the emails after hearing TC selling his little heart out on rightwing commentator Rusty Humphries’ radio show. Humphries calls on this Collab repeatedly to back something reactionary that Humphries has said. (If you ever heard the show, you’d know that, unlike some of his better known colleagues, who are at least skilled in disseminating their evil, Humphries just sits there and spouts racist and uneducated nonsense you’d hear in a dive with scruffy pool tables and that serves a whole lot of Pabst Blue Ribbon.) I’ve replaced the profanity—and there’s a bit, especially from him—with coinage that could pass the muster of a family oriented site. I’ve also deleted what I consider is now wordiness—mostly on my part, and I’ve also included—in parentheses—some comments.

Subject:
your tomming

Me: You’re getting the Tomming thing down wrong. I hear you every now and then on that Southern racist’s show–Rusty something, down in Atlanta. Anyway, you agree with everything he says. See, as I’ve noted, the guy’s a typical and limited Southern racist (much like Boortz); even black “conservatives” know that. One called after you appeared to say you were a “fool.†See, in order to gain a measure of credibility, you should … when Rusty says something stupid about blacks–and that’s pretty much all the time… “I see what blacks are saying about that topic and to be honest, Massa (I mean, Rusty), they have a point, but I feel we made enough progress in Amerikkka (I mean, America) that we have moved beyond that point.” See? You can’t just jump in and say, “You’re right, Massa (uh, Mr. Rusty, uh, Rusty); I been preachin’ all along myself, suh, that no rightwing person since God Almighty done made us ever been racist; it’s dem dere peoples on da left.” I mean, you come off looking like a stooge. True, that is what you are but hide it better. I find myself embarrassed for you every time you open your mouth. C’mon, now, let me detest you for the Uncle Tom you are instead of mainly feeling sorry for you. Anyway, you take care, Remus ….and please note that I contact you in the spirit of constructive criticism.

TC (The Collab):
LOL. “I contact you in the spirit of constructive criticism.” You (f-ing) monkeys crack me up. What else do I have to agree with you on? Your love of fat ugly women? Do I have to love that fact that you like having sex with children?
I’d gladly give up supporting ignorant (posterior female dogs) like you for anybody of any color.
I respond to you in the spirit of KISS MY BLACK (POSTERIOR)! LOL

(“Monkeys�. Yeah, I’m being snarky, but Wow. Anyway, I’m gratified others have apparently broached this topic with the Collab; these folks are, as I pointed out in another blog, dangerous.)

Me: You’re a rather touchy Uncle, aren’t you? Oh, for the record, I’m a guy but it’s good to know your feelings about black women. My guess would be it was your mother. But trust me, all black women aren’t as disgusting as she apparently is. You’re Exhibit A, by the way, of my theory that you Uncles are merely self-loathers. Those people whose (posteriors) you rush to kiss played such a role in this pathology. Learn to at least like yourself. For starters, get away from the racists who detest you. You’re such a sad little man.

( I got thrown off with TC’s reference to the female dog, so I thought he thought I was female even though the beginning of his missive makes it clear he doesn’t. However, I don’t suspect I’m too far off base about his feelings for black women. Actually, I couldn’t care less who you marry, as long as it’s for love. I think it’s more than a coincidence that a lot of these Collabs marry, well, folks who don’t look like Mom.)

TC: LOL. You can’t make me touchy, PedOphilaji. For the record, you are a (f-ing) putz. The nerve of you trying to tell people how to BE. As if you have it all together. I bet your sorry (posterior) is a (f-ing) WRECK of a person. Can’t keep a woman (or man), children hate you, no friends, so you sit around calling black people who don’t have your GLORIOUSLY (f-ed) up life to be like you!
What is so dangerous about DIFFERING thought in the black community? What’s scares you imbeciles so much. Is it the fact that some blacks might listen and begin feeling like victors instead of victims?
Each year I save about 70+ black children from you (f-ing) losers, and they go on to live beautiful lives, thinking for themselves (off the plantation.) YOU should try it. As my grandmother would have said, “Don’t be ignorant your whole life.”
(Screw) you very much, “good guy.”
(I catch a plea in there and for a moment I feel sorry for him. But I get over that. Like I said, these folks are dangerous. And wait a minute. How did he know my kids hate me? Just joking. I think. But funny he should mention that. My daughter has said I hate everybody. Anyway, I’m noticing something now about the Collab. He has a pouty mouth. I figure it’s time to descend to his level.)

Me: You have a very nasty mouth, Uncle Tom. I wonder if your racist “supporters” know you’re so foul. You’re super-polite to them–yet another example as my Exhibit A for self-loathing. I know. I hit a nerve. Good. Examine your life. Find out why you hate your own people (you) so much. Again, I’d point to your mother, or maybe Pa. Apparently, they hate (or hated, if they’ve gone on to their deserved expirations) black people too and taught you. I’m sure your grandmother–as would anyone in her generation–finds you, as she well should, disgusting. (And what’s with the repeated references to pedophilia–projecting? I wouldn’t be surprised. That is the behavior of a self-loather.) Now, to get to your level. You are a piece of (feces), something to be flushed. Frankly, I don’t care if your sorry (posterior) comes around or not. If a Mack truck hits you tomorrow, I’d say that would be cause for celebration. I’m not trying to save you. I’m not that noble. I’m just calling out your tortured (soul) for the Collaborator you are. The good news is that I’m not alone.

TC: My mouth is cleaner than your mother’s crotch, (Female Dog)! LOL
(Deep, huh?)

ME: You’re gay, aren’t you? Not that, of course, there’s anything wrong with that, but the constant references of a (female dog) to another guy and it sort of fits my self-loathing meme for you—since society despises gays too.

TC: LOL. You wish I was gay. Typical LibTURD, homophobe, but Conservatives are intolerant. When you see your mom and dad together, do you see two women like everybody else? Oh that’s right…you don’t know your daddy! LOL
ME: Spoken like a classic Newt racist. Or I guess that’s part of your “differing opinion” — which is always in sync with what Rush or the Grand Dragon would say. Wow. We couldn’t make you up. By the way, you are the un-busiest Uncle I’ve run into. Doesn’t Rusty, or Rush, need his shoes shined or something? Don’t let me keep you. Frankly, I am busy. I’ve told you what you needed to be told. I told you I’m not alone. Actions will take care of this ultimately. I don’t see what else is there to say beyond letting you know what time, metaphorically, it is. So go away, Uncle Tom, go away.

TC: (That’s) the best you got, punk? LOL. Your mother has hairy balls!

I guess he told me. So that was it, my correspondence with a Collab. Oh, and this all will be decided by action ultimately. In the interim, we need to keep calling them out. But this differing opinion business. Isn’t it amazing how what they, uh, believe can also be found on a white supremacist blog? We’re lazy folks who like to make babies and go to jail and Lord knows why since as we all know blacks face no injustice in the American marketplace or courts at all; heck, it’s the blacks who are the racists. And I suppose all this means that Benedict Arnold was not a traitor; he merely had a differing opinion.
And no, I didn’t enjoy the exchange as much as it may seem. I don’t really get off calling people Toms, or Collabs. I’m from the sixties. I’d seen a lot of blacker-than-thou then. I think that was why I never bought a dashiki. I’m also an artist. Which means I’m not naturally drawn to group-think. But the sheer audacity of this current crop of Collabs makes me feel I have no choice but to enter this fray. These are some dangerous folks. Last I checked, we’re trying to win something here. They stop progress. If you’re gonna win, whatever your movement, you need as many people as possible on the same page.

The Houston family has been gracious enough to allow us to see the homegoing service for Whitney Houston. Come on in and join us.

RIP, Whitney.

Aretha Franklin tribute to Whitney Houston, Charlotte, NC 2

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/_05nG_3rOPo ]


Creating jobs at home and strengthening the manufacturing industry

This week, President Obama discussed jobs and the manufacturing industry. Focusing on one of several issues, the tax code, President Obama offered ways to encourage job creation at home in the United States, not overseas:

“No company should get a tax break for outsourcing jobs. Instead, tax breaks should go to manufacturers who set up shop here at home. Bigger tax breaks should go to high-tech manufacturers who create the jobs of the future. And if you relocate a company in a struggling community, you should get help financing that new plant, that new equipment, or for training new workers. It’s time to stop rewarding businesses that ship jobs overseas, and start rewarding businesses that create jobs here in America. And Congress should send me that kind of tax reform right away.”

President Obama’s Weekly Address:

This page contained an embedded video. Click here to view it.

Saturday Open Thread

18 Feb 2012

Good Morning.

As you spend this weekend with family and friends, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

XXL Magazine has published a video of a 45-year-old rapper encouraging teenage boys to force themselves on underage girls. The graphic monologue is disturbing. So is the willingness of Harris Publications, which owns XXL, to give this kind of dangerous rhetoric a platform.

ColorOfChange is calling on Harris Publications to fire XXL Editor-in-Chief Vanessa Satten, who presides over the workplace culture that allowed such a grave misstep. Here’s the message we sent to our members, after you read it please join us.

Dear ColorofChange.org Member,

During a recent interview with the hip-hop magazine XXL, rapper Too $hort encouraged teenage boys to “turn girls out†by pushing “her up against the wall.â€1The 45-year-old rapper continued, graphically urging his audience to put their hands inside the underwear of middle school-aged girls in order to achieve what he called “mind manipulation.†The magazine packaged the disturbing monologue under the headline “Fatherly Advice From Too $hort.â€

Afternoon Open Thread

17 Feb 2012

hat tip-The Obama Diary:

Our First Lady greeted visitors to the White House.

Here is the entire thing, and underneath are wonderful clips from it:

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/0hLMc-6ocRk ]

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/2FjsHU7ilkk ]

Good Afternoon.

As you go through the rest of your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And continue to have a peaceful day.

Read the rest of this entry »

On Thursday, Pat Buchanan used his column to announce that he has officially parted ways with MSNBC. He credited the more than 86,000 ColorOfChange members who flooded the network with emails and phone calls late last year. Buchanan writes:

A group called Color of Change, whose mission statement says that it “exists to strengthen Black America’s political voice,” claimed that my book espouses a “white supremacist ideology.” Color of Change took particular umbrage at the title of Chapter 4, “The End of White America.”

Read the rest of this entry »

Imagine this – you’re walking down the street near your home on the way to the local market to buy some food. It’s hot so you’re wearing a short-sleeved shirt that shows off your muscled arms and colorful tatoos. The police stop you and ask about your tatoos – are you part of a gang? You say no, but they don’t believe you and the next thing you know you’ve been arrested and put in jail. You continue to protest your innocence but are told it will be several weeks before you’ll be able to go before a judge and tell your story.

So, through no fault of your own, you find yourself locked up in a severely overcrowded jail with thousands of others, lacking adequate food, water and basic sanitary facilities. It’s hell but you console yourself with the belief your innocence will eventually win your release. You’re lying in your cell thinking of your family and suddenly you smell smoke and hear people yelling, “FIRE”. You search for an exit, but there is none……You realize that you’re trapped……..is this how it ends for you?

Sounds like the script of a bad t.v. movie, but it was real life for hundreds of prisoners trapped in a Honduran jail this week. More than 350 people died when fire raged through an overcrowded jail near the capital, Tegucigalpa.

As reported in the Washington Post:

Family members said guards fired on prisoners to keep them from fleeing the flames, though guards and firefighters said they were shots in the air to summon help and to respond to what they thought was a prison break.

The attorney general’s office said it was investigating all angles.

“It’s impossible to believe that prisoners set the fire themselves when they too were going to die,†said Felix Armando Cardona, 56, whose son, Luis Armando Cardona, 28, died in the blaze that broke out in Comayagua prison late Tuesday night.

In Geneva, the U.N.’s human rights office said Friday that an independent probe is needed and that Honduras must prevent a recurrence since it was the third fatal prison fire in a Honduran prison in a decade.

From the time firefighters received a call at 10:59 p.m., what should have been a rescue became a catastrophe.

Only six guards were on duty, four in towers overlooking the prison and two overseeing 852 people crowded into a facility built for half that number. Some 57 percent had yet to be convicted, either awaiting trial or being held as suspected gang members, according to a government report.

Survivors said they watched helplessly as the guard who had the keys fled without unlocking their cells.

“He threw the keys on the floor in panic,†said Hector Daniel Martinez, who was being held as a homicide suspect.

Martinez said an inmate who was not locked in because he also worked as a nurse picked up the keys and, braving the scorching heat, went from one cell block to another, opening doors.

Lest one thinks these types of tragedies only happen to prisoners in other countries, let’s not forget what happened in New Orleans to the prisoners who were unfortunate enough to be locked up in the Orleans Parish Prison when Hurricane Katrina struck. In the clip below, a New Orleans law enforcement officer recounts the conditions he observed at Orleans Parish Prison in the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina. Thousands of people, many of whom had been picked up for minor offenses were abandoned and left to die when the levees broke and the building flooded.

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/RDbgH_E0v_c?fs=1

Similarly, James Ridway of Mother Jones talks to Democracy Now’s Amy Goodman, about NYC Mayor Michael Bloomberg’s decision not to evacuate the thousands of people being held on Rikers Island in preparation for Hurricane Irene.

PRISONERS ARE PEOPLE TOO!! Join the movement for Justice = OCCUPY4PRISONERS.ORG

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

It really doesn’t get any better than this for the Democrats.

Yesterday, House Oversight Committee Chairman Rep. Darrell Issa (R-CA) stirred up a hornet’s nest of controversy when he wouldn’t allow a woman to be placed as a witness for a committee hearing he was chairing about contraception. He later defended his decision by saying the woman’s testimony would have been irrelevant because she “wasn’t a member of the clergy” and therefore really wasn’t qualified to be on the panel of imminently ‘qualified’ men. Men who were called to testify about contraception in a hearing called to ’examine’ the Obama administration’s new regulation requiring employers and insurers to provide contraception coverage to their employees. Because only men are qualified to testify about this religious freedom issue (Issa’s words) which actually has nothing to do with women but is strictly about “what would Jesus do?” or something like that.

Riiiiiight.

In truth, the only purpose of Issa’s hearing is to put Obama’s new policy on trial in an election year when the Republicans are running out of issues and are stuck with a pack of bad jokes in place of candidates. Sad, but in an entertaining sort of way.

From ABC News:

“Where are the women?†the minority Rep. Carolyn Maloney, D-N.Y., asked early in the hearing.

She criticized the Republican committee chairman, Rep. Darrel Issa, for wanting to “roll back the fundamental rights of women to a time when the government thought what happens in the bedroom is their business.â€

“We will not be forced back to that primitive era,†she said.

Issa bristled at the charge and said Democrats could not add their witness because she was not a member of the clergy, but a student at Georgetown. He also faulted Democrats for not submitting the name of the witness, Sandra Fluke, in time.

Among the witnesses invited by Issa to attend the hearing was a representative of the Catholic bishops, who oppose the Obama administration “accommodation†on birth-control coverage. Joining them are many other men of other religions. Not invited, complained Democrats, were representatives from the Catholic Health Association, which is run by a woman and actually runs the Catholic hospitals, nor Catholic Charities, both of which said Friday they supported the president’s plan.

Issa’s staff sent a letter to the Democrats, saying, “As the hearing is not about reproductive rights but instead about the administration’s actions as they relate to freedom of religion and conscience, he believes  that Ms. Fluke is not an appropriate witness.â€

Darrell Issa issa crazy.

At this point all I want is for the Republicans to keep handing the Democrats ammunition. They really are making this too easy.

This is being cross-posted at Black Liberal Boomer

Friday Open Thread

17 Feb 2012

hat tips-The Obama Diary, 3CHICSPOLITICO

President Obama Speaks About Insourcing Jobs

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/akXxULef4gM ]

Supporting Military Spouse Employment

TGIF and Good Morning.

As you go through your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

Read the rest of this entry »

Most people think slavery in the U.S. ended with the passage of the 13th Amendment right after the Civil War. The 13th Amendment is short and sweet in its Declaration:

“Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction.”[emphasis added]

As it turns out, that simple phrase ‘except as punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted’ is an exception that has come to include so many people, that in many ways it can be argued slavery never really ended in the United States. I believe the abolitionists and their radical Republican representatives could not have anticipated that this non-controversial exception for convicted felons would end up putting more black men into penal servitude than had lived under chattel slavery when the Civil War began.

It seems the old adage is true, “where there’s a will, there’s a way”. There has always been a will within the U.S. economic system to exploit human resources. Slavery represents the ultimate exploitation of human resources – people are considered property to be utilized and disposed of at the will of those with legal control over them.

Almost 150 years after the Civil War, far from becoming a “freer” society, the United States leads the world in penal servitude. The rate of incarceration in the United States surpasses that of every other nation by a wide margin — and as documented conclusively by Michelle Alexander in the New Jim Crow, African-Americans have been systemically and deliberately targeted by law enforcement practices that have created a new and more pernicious racial caste system in which criminalization brands one for life as a member.

The Cold Hard Facts on Incarceration
Via: Criminology

One would think given these statistics there would be a serious discussion in this country about whether we’ve gone overboard in the use of punishment and incarceration as a means of controlling people. There is a national conversation about prisons, but it’s not really about whether they are humane or effective, rather the debate is all about the BENJAMINS – the costs of corrections and law enforcement as a percentage of state budgets.

Republicans propose a solution from their all-purpose playbook – ‘Privatize It!’. Private prisons are all the rage among conservatives as part of their ‘fiscal austerity’ agenda. According to them, private companies such as Corrections Corporation of America (CCA) can do a better job than government of managing our prisons without compromising public safety and/or prisoner health. Leading the debate has been Governor Rick Scoot – Tweedledum to Scott Walker’s Tweedledee – who supported legislation that would have dramatically expanded the role of private prisons in Florida’s correctional system – a state with the sixth largest prison population in the country.

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/EpekN7fujLA?fs=1

As has been true of a lot of his political agenda, Governor Scott miscalculated. It turns out a lot his erstwhile Tea Party supporters did not believe his claims regarding the fiscal benefits of privatizing state prisons, as reported by the Wall Street Journal:

After fierce debate and lobbying by the Governor and his legislative supporters, the proposal was defeated in the Florida senate this week. The rebuke of Scott and the state’s Republican leadership on this issue was motivated in part by concern over the almost 4,000 corrections officers whose jobs would be jeopardized, as well as growing evidence from other states that privatization is not the panacea many think. Contrary to the claims of proponents, private prisons are actually less safe – more incidents of assaults against guards and other prisoners and they have less experienced personnel who often cave under pressure.

Russian TV has done a more thorough job of reporting on this issue than most US media – Private Prison in Florida, Report from RTV: Ana Kasparian of The Young Turks discusses:

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/QTHlxunoRpg?fs=1

Rather than focusing on saving money by cutting costs on prisoners and the people who manage them, we should look for alternatives to incarceration and demand our leaders pursue public safety strategies that value PEOPLE OVER PROFITS!!

Then – black prisoners = free labor in Reconstruction South:

Now – black prisoners = free labor in the New South:

This article was first published on PolicyMic.com

On September 17, 2011, a group of young people occupied Zuccotti Park in New York City’s financial district. Shortly thereafter, their oft-repeated slogan of being the “99%†started to ricochet in the news media. The heavy news coverage has allowed their slogan to seep into the public consciousness.
Henceforth, the “Occupy movement,†as it became known, started influence political conservation. Before the launch of the movement, the issue of inequality was a mere afterthought. The agitation of the Occupiers put the spotlight on the ever-growing chasm between the “1%†and the “99%.†Their plight will make economic inequality one of the central issues in the upcoming presidential campaign.
As this debate starts to percolate, it is important to examine some of the factors that have contributed to this deep inequality. From 1945 to 1986, the top tax rate ranged from 90% to 50%. During those decades, there was a consensus between both parties that the government had to be funded by keeping taxes at an appropriate level. Many Republicans opposed President Kennedy’s tax cuts because they feared that it could lead to deficit.
Unlike the decades following World War II when the economic prosperity was broadly shared, those at the top of the economic ladder began to enjoy a greater share of the economic pie during the 1980s. Moreover, since the 1970s, the income of the average worker started to stagnate.
The economy, however, had been able to produce enough jobs to keep the unemployment low for most of the past three decades. The en-mass entry of women into the job market had cushioned the blow that would have resulted from this income stagnation, since one paycheck could no longer provide economic security.
Even though the economy was still producing jobs, the country had seen a rise in service jobs that neither paid nor provide the same benefits as manufacturing jobs. As a result, even households with two paychecks sometimes struggle to maintain a middle class lifestyle. The economic boom of the 1990s helped strengthened the middle class because of the tremendous number of jobs that were created and other policy initiatives targeting middle income Americans.
Whereas the 1990s was a decade in which the middle class had made some economic gains, the following decade has been characterized as a “lost decade.†During those years, the income of the middle class had barely budged; in fact, it was the first recorded decade to see a decline in median income and a zero net job growth. Worse yet, a great number of Americans ran up their credit cards or borrowed money on their homes, especially during the housing bubble, to maintain their middle class lifestyle. During the Bush years, there was a weak economic expansion driven in part by home construction. In the words of the economist Paul Krugman, Americans “made a living by selling houses to each there.” This housing boom was fueled by easy credit, which was seemingly given to anyone.
The bursting of the housing bubble and the financial collapse that ensued has wiped out the home equity of a large number of Americans. This negative equity has sunk many middle class families into debt. Even worse, millions of people lost their homes. In a society where owning a home had always been synonymous to having a foothold in the middle class and living the American Dream, this loss turned that dream into a recurring nightmare for those Americans.
In the past 30 years the wages of many middle class families have not kept up with the increase in the cost of living. The housing devastation occurred in the midst of this. In an excellent article, Michael Hirsch highlights the bleak economic realities. For instance, he points out that it would require a yearly salary of $68,000 for a family of four to pay for their mortgages, college and health care costs, along with their gas prices. In 2010, however, half of the jobs in the U.S. pay“less than $33, 840.†It is no wonder, then, that many families are drowning in debt.
While American manufacturing has never been more productive, change in technology and competition from China and other emerging economies have led to the elimination of millions of jobs. This post industrial economy tends to disproportionately benefit the well educated and the wealthy. But with a high school diploma, it is nearly impossible to secure a job that would afford one a middle class lifestyle. Instead of looking for innovative solutions to this vexing problem, the Republican Party has embraced a rigid tax cut ideology. For many conservatives, tax cut is a panacea that cures whatever ills the economy. The tax cuts that they favor are those that chiefly benefit the wealthy. This approach to taxation has been predicated on the belief that a lower rate on the investor class would spur economic growth. Thus, it would be “a rising tide that would lift all boats.†For more than thirty years, however, many struggling middle and working class Americans are still awaiting this growth.
In the past, when the economy was still growing jobs and the overall economic situation had not been as desperate as it is today, conservatives had been successful in stifling any serious debate about inequality and the need for any increase in taxes by characterizing the very discussion as “class warfare.†They quickly resorted to the same characterizations when Obama began to talk about tax fairness. We are living in different times. Those oft-repeated buzzwords do not carry the same resonance at a time when people are still reeling from the financial collapse.
As long as the average American continues to feel the pinch of the Great Recession, economic inequality, which has been exacerbated by a regressive tax policy that decidedly favors the super rich, will be a potent political issue in the presidential election. Even more important, if the “class warfare†slogan continues to lose its resonance among the public, the Republicans, particularly the party’s nominee, would need to come up with concrete proposals to address the growing economic inequality, and the slow recovery that has been turning a significant segment of middle income Americans into MINO, middle class in name only.
Photo Credit: Wikimedia Commons

Afternoon Open Thread

16 Feb 2012

I’ll be dropping some videos this afternoon.

From Rev. Al: He talks about Willard doubling down about ‘ Let Detroit Go Bankrupt’.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

In case you didn’t know it, Mr. Grover ‘ Drown Government in a Bathtub’ Norquist, said some interesting stuff about Willard.

From Lawrence O’Donnell:

Norquist tells Romney who’s boss
By Anthony Reyes – Tue Feb 14, 2012 6:06 PM EST.
This year’s CPAC had a lot of memorable moments, mainly because the conference gives every important conversative the opportunity to state their purpose. They put themselves on record and we are all left to glean their worldview and intentions. And much of what was covered were the speeches given by the Republican candidates for president and the fiery presentations by Ann Coulter and Sarah Palin.

David Frum called attention to Grover Norquist’s speech where he said something extremely significant. Our very own Lawrence O’Donnell has explained many times how Norquist is the most powerful man in Washington who does not live in the White House.

Norquist brazenly admitted that even the person in the White House does not matter much anymore.

——————————————————————————–

“We are not auditioning for fearless leader. We don’t need a president to tell us in what direction to go,” Norquist said on Saturday. “The leadership now for the modern conservative movement for the next 20 years will be coming out of the House and the Senate.”

Grover Norquist confessed that he wants a weak-willed president, like Mitt Romney, in office so he can be forced to sign every bill sent from a Republican congress Norquist controls. To him, that person just needs “enough working digits to handle a pen.”

Just imagine it: an unchecked Norquist Congress. A harrowing reminder of the stakes involved this November.

Visit msnbc.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy

Good Afternoon.

As you go through the rest of your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And continue to have a peaceful day.

Read the rest of this entry »

With Obama-logo bedazzled pick in hair, ?uestlove lays it down on why he’s still down with the President.

He says it’s not a quick fix and that we’ve got to have the Prez’s back. Here’s the text of the vid in case you’re at work and can’t pop your audio:

“Ladies and gentleman, my name is Amir Questlove Thompson. When I started supporting Barack Obama in 2008 he promised to bring real change and hope to our country and community as a whole. This is not a quick fix. It’s not like you can take a wand “BING”, and just make magic overnight. He needs eight years to finish the mission and we need to have his back. If you haven’t yet–you really need to get involved. Go to http://AfricanAmericans.BarackObama.com sign up–and then follow all the action on Twitter using the hash tag: #AfAm2012. Thank you.”

If you agree, head on down to the new website that’s just for us: http://AfricanAmericans.BarackObama.com

I’m a big fan of the Roots myself — and I love that they’ve stood by positive black leaders like Van Jones and have stood up for causes like Earth Day before. Make a little black history – go on with your bad self!

Thursday Open Thread

16 Feb 2012

hat tip-The Obama Diary:


First Lady Michelle Obama greets a chef while visiting the dining facility at Little Rock Air Force Base in Little Rock, Ark., as part of a tour celebrating the second anniversary of the “Let’s Move!†initiative, Feb. 9, 2012. Little Rock Air Force Base is part of a pilot program that has enhanced food service quality, variety, and availability through new acquisition processes and redesign efforts.
—Official White House Photo by Sonya N. Hebert

The First Day of The First Lady’s Lets Move! Anniversary Tour

[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/DVTnvr79M-M ]

Good Morning.

As you make it through your day, don’t forget JJP.

Drop those links. Engage in debate. Give us trivia and gossip too.

And always, have a peaceful day.

Read the rest of this entry »


Who We Are

Cheryl Contee aka "Jill Tubman", Baratunde Thurston aka "Jack Turner", rikyrah, Leutisha Stills aka "The Christian Progressive Liberal", B-Serious, Casey Gane-McCalla, Jonathan Pitts-Wiley aka "Marcus Toussaint," Fredric Mitchell, Keith Owens, Anson Asaka, Barbara Moore, Deborah Small, Lisa Coffman, Michael Patton

Special Contributors: Rashad Robinson, Marvin Randolph, Phaedra Ellis-Lamkins, James Rucker, Rinku Sen, Adam Luna

Technical Contributor: Brandon Sheats



Sponsors

Advertise here!

Community Activity



Change Action Center


[image]

[image]

HealthCare.gov: Take health care into your own hands Learn More


This page contained an embedded video. Click here to view it.


[image]


Archives

Peep ‘Em

This Week In Blackness Banner 300px

I Am A Community Organizer (300x243)
[image]

Black Behind Coverage/Disclaimer

This is a personal weblog which does not represent the views of the authors' employers, clients nor vendors.

Ain’t Like All The Rest

Jack and Jill Politics is not affiliated with Jack and Jill of America, Jack and Jill Magazine, "Jack and Jill Went Up the Hill to Fetch a Pail of Water" nor any of the other Jack and Jills out there on the Google. Just so's you know.
[image]


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser