New to my blog? You may want to learn more about me, subscribe to my RSS feed or friend me on Facebook. If you're looking for an online marketing consultant or just want to communicate offline, please use the contact information available here on the site.
One of the bigger pieces of search industry news today is that Google has released an algorithmic change they’re calling “Megasitelinks.”
A Quick Primer on Google Megasitelinks
Aside from having a completely uninspiring codename, here’s what we know about Google Megasitelinks:
Known Problems in Google Sitelinks
Since these new Megasitelinks are so new, there’s a lot that remains to be seen with how these conceptual changes will change what Google users see. At the core of it all, it makes sense – Google wants to improve user experience and geo-relevant information has been proven to do that in the past.
One of the most frustrating things about the existing Google Sitelinks platform has been the lack of webmaster input. In Google’s Webmaster Tools, there are certainly “controls” where a webmaster can offer up suggested suppression lists to prevent certain URLs from appearing in the Sitelinks area. In most cases though – those “suggestions” that come from a webmaster are disregarded.
No joke, I have more than five clients at this point in time who are experiencing frustration with the Sitelinks controls and the lack of influence their suggested changes actually have on the SERPs.
Naturally, this leads me to ask one thing…
Is Megasitelinks a Step Forward or Backward?
I’ve logged in to a few Google Webmaster Tools accounts this evening and have not seen any UI changes in the controls or suppression lists.
To be fair, I didn’t really expect to though. I guess you could say that I was hoping for something new to be in there for us as marketers and site owners to work with.
Here’s the thing for me. If Google Sitelinks is now a program that uses an intelligent algorithm to display a subset of pages relevant to a searcher’s query, then there needs to be functional controls in place for them – or no controls at all. The grey area where Google asks for suggestions but ignores them is an old act.
In other words, Google – please don’t waste our time.
Changes in Sitelinks We Could Actually Use
If Google is committed to making the most of the Sitelinks tools, it has to be a two way street where they focus on user experience and search quality and they allow us as webmasters to permit certain content from being displayed, hidden, etc.
Other items that would be great to see include:
Megasitelinks and Online Reputation Management Issues
I’ve witnessed a number of branded search results that provided companies with a free pass from a lot of negative reviews. In particular, the Sitelinks 12-pack growth has done a lot to push negative press in the SERPs below the fold. That’s good for brands, bad for searchers. I won’t get into the entire RoR-style-site issues — but it’s clear that geographically relevant Sitelinks will sway ORM issues one way or another depending on what’s shown.
What do you think about the news of Google’s Megasitelinks? Are you expecting them to prove as an innovation – or flop? Share your thoughts in the comments area below.
One month ago today I decided to bring my blog back from more than a two year hiatus. The reason I brought it back was quite clear — Google+ had created enough momentum that I couldn’t ignore it. My opinions began to form and I felt compelled enough to publish them for the purpose of initiating some discussions.