Most Helpful Customer Reviews
10 of 10 people found the following review helpful:
4.0 out of 5 stars Not King's best, but among his most emotionally compelling,
4 Sep 2005
Firestarter gets comparatively little attention among Stephen King novels. It doesn't make many readers' list of favorites, it's sometimes falsely dubbed a recycled version of Carrie, and the film adaptation of it didn't do the novel any favors. I first read Firestarter some twenty years ago, and frankly I remembered it in somewhat fuzzy terms. Having reread it again now, a quarter century after its original publication, that ambivalence I felt has been turned into - well, something. I don't think anyone would consider this King's best novel. It is very much a localized story, built mainly upon emotion; certain questions can be asked about the story's progression, and we never really come to "know" the bad guys as intimately as we do in so many other King classics - Rainbird is for me a problematic character in this story; like the young protagonist, I just never feel as if I can truly read him. There is no real adrenaline rush for me in these pages, either, and that is probably the main reason I had such hazy memories of the story after all these years. Having said all that, though, I have to point to some real strengths of Firestarter. It is one of King's most poignant novels, sad and depressing rather than horrifying. The relationship between Andy McGee and his daughter Charlie is by turns heartwarming and heart wrenching; seeing this seven-year-old girl suffer so much can be hard at times, and those moments when Charley screams for her Daddy, her only source of comfort and safety in her unimaginably horrible world, definitely affect you as the reader. It makes Firestarter a somewhat sobering read, one you may want to put out of your mind rather than revisit - that is this novel's power.
Charlie McGee is just a cute little girl, yet she is denied anything resembling a normal life. Her parents participated in a psychological study back in college that earned them two hundred dollars and strange new powers. They had unwittingly served as guinea pigs for an experimental-drug called Lot Six - courtesy of The Shop, a covert part of the federal government. Andy has the ability to "push" people into thinking and doing what he wants, while his wife Vicki is able to move things with her mind. Their abilities are comparatively weak, but such is not the case with their daughter: Charlie can start fires with her mind. Charlie's unprecedented powers make her a subject of great interest for The Shop - and eventually they come for her. Andy is forced to flee with his daughter after his wife is killed and Charlie herself temporarily abducted by government agents, but his limited power can only take them so far because the "push" exerts a painful physical toll on him. Charlie has to grow up in a hurry, as she seeks to understand who and what she is and to distinguish right from wrong in a crazy world that blurs the lines of good and evil. Her parents taught her that she should never use her power, yet she is put into positions in which that frightening ability borne from something inside her is the only thing that can keep her and her father safe and free. She is scared of the power, partly because she has trouble controlling it, but even more because a part of her enjoys using it. King's development of Charlie's feelings in this regard is masterfully done.
The novel makes little secret that the eventual ending will be a tragic one. The climactic events, however, don't take place on an elaborate scope; in fact, the majority of the action goes down in only two distinct locations. The fulcrum exists in the form of a grotesque human being named Rainbird. He's really the only interesting antagonist in the entire story, but I just don't know that his actions are justified by the things we learn about him - principally, his fascination with death. In my mind, he's one of King's weakest villains.
This is starting to sound like a negative review, but in actuality I regard Firestarter as a fascinating novel that shows how King is equally proficient at evoking love as he is terror. There's a strong sociological component to the novel. After all, the villain here is not a werewolf, ghost, or monster of any kind; it is nothing less than the government of the United States itself. In the 1970s, we began to learn about some of the heinous experiments our own government had perpetrated upon us (among the least of which was the injection of psychotic drugs to unknown participants) and the equally awful manner in which they covered such things up. If anything makes Firestarter scary, it is the fact that the novel was inspired by actual government-sponsored crimes of the most despicable kind. I'm sure the impact of Firestarter resonated much more deeply in 1980 than it does now, but this is only because we now know how untrustworthy the government can be. Still, Charlie's story is a most compelling one, and it shows us another side of Stephen King during the most productive phase of his unparalleled career.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
4 of 4 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars Firestarter,
21 Oct 2009
King's tale of a young girl with the power of pyrokinesis is more than just the out and out horror you would expect. He engages the readers sympathy for the protagonists from the first page, with a father on the run from government agents with his tired little girl. King continues to engage our empathy with flashbacks to the murder of the girls mother, her own struggle to use her ability to help her father, and her attempts to controll her urge to use her power.
This novel is a testament to King's technique and as usual with Stephen King, every character is fully realised.
Reccomended for: King fans, horror fans, conspiracy theorists, literature lovers and anyone who wants a good story.
"'I'm all right daddy,'... 'Everything's okay'.
And that was when the cars began to explode"
Absolute genius!
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
3 of 3 people found the following review helpful:
5.0 out of 5 stars One of his best,
12 April 2006
It's not as well known a novel as say, The Stand or The Shining (although there was a film made starring Drew Barrymore), but for me this is one of King's best works. The story is of a man who takes part in a clinical trial of a new drug while at university, and who picks up an ability to influence people's actions with his mind, somewhat Jedi-like. He later passes on to his daughter the power to start fires with her mind, something which makes her the target of a shady government group intent on using her powers for their own gain.
It's one of King's most tightly plotted novels, completely lacking in his sometimes too-frequent ramblings that don't seem to go anywhere. Though not really horror, it does have King's typically excellent characterisation, and as usual I felt very connected to the main character's plight and cared a lot about his outcome. Definitely highly recommended.
Help other customers find the most helpful reviews
Was this review helpful to you? Yes No
Most Recent Customer Reviews
3.0 out of 5 stars average
reading stephen king reviews is almost as good as the books themselves. they seem to be divided into fanboy reviews where everything is excellent, who would review his shopping... Read more
Published 3 months ago by dk
5.0 out of 5 stars An overlooked gem and a crackling story
Andy McGee, a young student, willingly takes part in a medical experiment to raise a little cash. The experiment, sponsored by a shady government organisation called "The Shop"... Read more
Published 4 months ago by Crookedmouth
5.0 out of 5 stars EXPLOSIVE
Up there with THE STAND- SALEM'S LOT- DEAD ZONE- DIFFERENT SEASONS-CUJO-- King's purple patch!
I've read 27 books by SK and FIRESTARTER is one of the best,enough said!
Published 13 months ago by K.H.
5.0 out of 5 stars An amazing book. Really worth your time to read it.
I first read this on holiday when I was 11, and managed to finish it in two weeks. I have since (like other Stephen King books) been able to read it over and over again with a... Read more
Published 17 months ago by L11VYK
4.0 out of 5 stars Not one of his best, but still.
Firestarter was a very good read.Not one of King's best, but fascinating nonetheless.It basically revolves around characters and their emotions and feelings and not so much around... Read more
Published 23 months ago by Giota V.
5.0 out of 5 stars Firestarter
I have read `Firestarter' numerous times now and each time I read it I forget how addictive it is. Once you have read the first 30 or so pages then it is hard work to refrain... Read more
Published on 29 Dec 2009 by Spider Monkey
2.0 out of 5 stars boring read
I was hooked at the beginning of this book then got about half way through and gave up. The only book that ive liked so far of stephen kings is the shining which i read right... Read more
Published on 15 Sep 2008 by lucy port
5.0 out of 5 stars Firestarter
This is one of Kings better books and keeps you hooked throughout. As usual for King (despite other failings) his characterisation is spot on and you engage straight away with... Read more
Published on 21 Dec 2007 by Spider Monkey
5.0 out of 5 stars Set the night on fire!
Charlie's parents once needed some money - as college students they both took part in a drug trail.
The drug unknown to them had queer properties and the trail may have... Read more
Published on 21 Jun 2006 by Jackiesmackie
4.0 out of 5 stars Firestarter
As an ardent King fan it's always slightly difficult to be very objective when writing a review but even leaving that aside Firestarter is a great novel. Read more
Published on 27 Jan 2005 by Rich Milligan