I used Livejournal to host my blog from 2002 through late 2010, when the level of quality and utility finally decreased enough that it was easier to self-host my blog than to keep fighting with Livejournal.
These were my reasons for giving up on Livejournal, and some links explaining what I replaced it with:
It was unconscionable that my readers would often be shown full-screen pop-over Flash ads on top of my content, even though I have a "permanent" account. I don't know whether the problem was that Livejournal's policy kept changing, or whether they just couldn't fix the bugs in their ad code, and I don't care; my readers kept complaining about it, and rightly so.
The spam got completely out of control. I was getting a ton of comments like, "Ha ha, that same thing happened to me when I tried to fix my bathroom plumbing, HREF=SPAM-PLUMBERS-INFO-VIAGRA-UK". Or the same thing but in Russian. Turning on CAPTCHAs didn't help. The only option that did work was to moderate comments from non-friends, which is as much work as playing whack-a-mole with the spam.
I used to use LJ as my RSS feed aggregator, and that got less and less reliable every day. Often feeds would stall for days or weeks at a time, dumping out the new posts all at once and very late. Often weeks' worth of posts would just go missing because one of the posts in a feed had some minor HTML syntax error in it. Feeds that contained Youtube videos or other embeds wouldn't show the videos at all; and so on. So I switched all of my feeds over to a feed reader and couldn't be happier. I use NetNewsWire on the desktop, and use either NetNewsWire or Reeder on my iPhone and iPad.
I used to use Livejournal's Jabber server as my way of chatting with people on Google Chat and Facebook Chat (via the Adium client). Livejournal's Jabber server became increasingly unreliable. When it wasn't down outright, it often silently failed to peer with the rest of the Jabber network for weeks at a time. I gave up and signed up for a GMail account which I use solely so that I can have a Jabber account on Google's server.
This is why "use DreamWidth" isn't a solution to the Livejournal problem. That may fix a few of their technical issues, but it doesn't change the fact that the community has gone away. That's just trading one sinking ship for a much smaller copy of the same sinking ship.
I now self-host my blog on my own site using WordPress. It was a relatively painless migration. WordPress is easy to install, and there are tools for bulk-importing your Livejournal into it. You can read how I did it, and the list of plugins I chose, on my blog post about it.
I was initially worried that if I moved my blog away from LJ, I would get fewer comments. That turned out not to be the case. People who still use LJ can log in on my new blog using LJ as their OpenID provider, so it's relatively painless for them to comment there. (No need to make a new account or anything.)
</a>
Please enjoy jwz mixtape 111.
[ http://lj-toys.com/?auth_token=sessionless%3A1329310800%3Aembedcontent%3A515656%26914%26%3A6553e9e955299db12990a2026de86587cf385d4e
Mirrored from jwz.org.
This video is designed to be viewed in a large format, so it's best viewed in full-screen mode at 1080p.
Mirrored from jwz.org.
This means that we are nowhere near close to having more alive than dead. In fact, there are 15 dead people for every person living. We surpassed seven billion dead way back between 8000BC and AD1.
In "2001: A Space Odyssey", Arthur C Clark makes the assertion: "Behind every man now alive stand 30 ghosts, for that is the ratio by which the dead outnumber the living." But Ms Baldwin points out he was not wrong. "He was making his statement in 1968. There were maybe 3.5 billion people currently living on earth so if you use our method, that would be one living person to 29 dead."
And will we ever reach a point where there are more alive than dead? This would imply a very high rate of population growth. "Could we imagine a carrying capacity of the Earth of 100-150 billion? I find that quite unimaginable."
They're counting from 50,000 years ago, "behaviorally modern humans", instead of from 200,000 years ago, "anatomically modern humans", which seems iffy to me.
Mirrored from jwz.org.
"A posthumous pardon was not considered appropriate as Alan Turing was properly convicted of what at the time was a criminal offence. He would have known that his offence was against the law and that he would be prosecuted."
Mirrored from jwz.org.
Also an eerily silent and largely Ken Burnsey video of the manufacturing process:
Mirrored from jwz.org.
The Death and Return of Superman
This is an entertaining rant, even though I never read "The Death of Superman", having already been squarely in the "who gives a flying fuck" camp at the time, so I didn't realize just how stupid it was. Apparently it was even stupider than I had imagined. And I can imagine quite a bit. I do disagree with his conclusion, though, that this craven stunt "broke" death in comics. It was already broken when they got there. Characters were dying and coming back all the time long before that, and anyone who thought Superman would stay dead was a fucking idiot.
Mirrored from jwz.org.
You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here