Ph: 474640376

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
  (Redirected from FRBR)
Jump to: navigation, search

Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), sometimes pronounced /ˈfɜrbər/, is a conceptual entity-relationship model developed by the International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions (IFLA) that relates user tasks of retrieval and access in online library catalogues and bibliographic databases from a user’s perspective. It represents a more holistic approach to retrieval and access as the relationships between the entities provide links to navigate through the hierarchy of relationships. The model is significant because it is separate from specific cataloguing standards such as AACR2 or International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD).

Contents

1 FRBR entities 2 Relationships
2.1 Equivalence relationships 2.2 Derivative relationships 2.3 Descriptive relationships
3 See also 4 References 5 External links

[edit] FRBR entities

Group 1 entities and basic relations (RDF version)
Group 2 entities and relations

FRBR comprises groups of entities:

Group 1 entities are work, expression, manifestation, and item (WEMI). They represent the products of intellectual or artistic endeavour. Group 2 entities are person and corporate body, responsible for the custodianship of Group 1’s intellectual or artistic endeavour. Group 3 entities are subjects of Group 1 or Group 2’s intellectual endeavour, and include concepts, objects, events, places.

Group 1 entities are the foundation of the FRBR model:

Work is a "distinct intellectual or artistic creation."[1] For example, Beethoven's Ninth Symphony apart from all ways of expressing it is a work. When we say, "Beethoven's Ninth is magnificent!" we generally are referring to the work.
Expression is "the specific intellectual or artistic form that a work takes each time it is 'realized.'"[1] An expression of Beethoven's Ninth might be the musical score he writes down.
Manifestation is "the physical embodiment of an expression of a work. As an entity, manifestation represents all the physical objects that bear the same characteristics, in respect to both intellectual content and physical form."[1] The recording the London Philharmonic made of the Ninth in 1996 is a manifestation. When we say, "The recording of the London Philharmonic's 1996 performance captured the essence of the Ninth," we are generally referring to a manifestation.
Item is "a single exemplar of a manifestation. The entity defined as item is a concrete entity."[1] Each of the 1996 pressings of that 1996 recordfing is an item. When we say, "Both copies of the London Philharmonic's 1996 performance of the Ninth are checked out of my local library," we are generally referring to items.

[edit] Relationships

FRBR is built upon relationships between and among entities. "Relationships serve as the vehicle for depicting the link between one entity and another, and thus as the means of assisting the user to ‘navigate’ the universe that is represented in a bibliography, catalogue, or bibliographic database."[2] Examples of relationship types include, but are not limited to:[3]

[edit] Equivalence relationships

Equivalence relationships exist between exact copies of the same manifestation of a work or between an original item and reproductions of it, so long as the intellectual content and authorship are preserved. Examples include reproductions such as copies, issues, facsimiles and reprints, photocopies, and microfilms.

[edit] Derivative relationships

Derivative relationships exist between a bibliographic work and a modification based on the work. Examples include:

Editions, versions, translations, summaries, abstracts, and digests Adaptations that become new works but are based on old works Genre changes New works based on the style or thematic content of the work

[edit] Descriptive relationships

Descriptive relationships exist between a bibliographic entity and a description, criticism, evaluation, or review of that entity, such as between a work and a book review describing it. Descriptive relationships also includes annotated editions, casebooks, commentaries, and critiques of an existing work.

[edit] See also

Functional Requirements for Authority Records FRSAD FRBRoo

[edit] References

^ a b c d http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr1.htm#3.2 ^ http://www.ifla.org/VII/s13/frbr/frbr2.htm#5 ^ International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions. "Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records: Final Report". http://www.ifla.org/files/cataloguing/frbr/frbr_2008.pdf. Retrieved 13 November 2011. 
This article includes a list of references, related reading or external links, but its sources remain unclear because it lacks inline citations. Please improve this article by introducing more precise citations. (September 2011)
IFLA Study Group on the Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records. Functional requirements for bibliographic records : final report. — München: K.G. Saur, 1998. — (UBCIM publications ; new series, vol. 19). — ISBN 3-598-11382-X. (Accessed Nov. 6, 2005) Tillett, Barbara. FRBR: A Conceptual Model for the Bibliographic Universe. Library of Congress Cataloging Distribution Service, 2004. (Accessed Nov. 6, 2005)

[edit] External links

RDA: Resource Description and Access The FRBR Blog: A weblog following developments around the world in FRBR Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records, International Federation of Library Associations and Institutions
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Functional_Requirements_for_Bibliographic_Records&oldid=474640376"
Personal tools
Log in / create account
Namespaces
Article Talk
Variants
Actions

You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser