Home
Ph: 12855914
[ http://www.blogger.com/navbar.g?targetBlogID=12855914

Sunday, February 19, 2012

Sunday Classics: Still more "Impressions of Debussy"

>

The beautiful Scottish soprano Mary Garden, chosen by Debussy to be the first Mélisande in 1902, sings the solo from the Tower Scene that opens Act III in this famous (if sadly limited technically) 1904 G&T recording with the composer at the piano.
Outside one of the castle towers. A circular path passes under a window of the tower.

MÉLISANDE [at the window, while she combs her unbound hair]: My long hair descends all the way to the foot of the tower.
My hair waits for you all the length of the tower.
And all the length of the day,
And all the length of the day.
Saint Daniel and Saint Michel,
Saint Michel and Saint Raphaël,
I was born on a Sunday,
a Sunday at noon . . .
And here, in a slightly better-sounding recording, is the treasured Brazilian soprano Bidú Sayão. Unfortunately, the brief orchestral introduction is missing in the CD issue. We continue then just through the entrance of Pelléas, singing "Holà! Holà! Ho," prompting Mélisande to ask, "Who's there?" (We'll hear more of this scene in the click-through.)

[ http://www.archive.org/embed/ActIiiOpeningSolosayaoCooper ]
Bidú Sayão (s), Mélisande; Martial Singer (b), Pelléas; Metropolitan Opera Orchestra, Emil Cooper, cond. Live performance, Jan. 13, 1945

by Ken

Just to recap: Last week we began listening to some of the works signaled by nine musicians asked by BBC Music Magazine -- for its February 2012 issue celebrating Debussy's 150th birthday -- to reveal the work of the composer which is most personal to them.

Last week we heard first, in the preview, the piano classic "Clair de lune, chosen by mezzo-soprano Susan Graham (who explained that she began her musical studies as a pianist and still is wont to play it for her own pleasure in her home in the hills of Santa Fe); and then the early piano Arabesques, cited by editor Oliver Condy; the piano Image "Reflections in the Water," chosen by pianist Noriko Ogawa; the piano prélude "La Cathédrale engloutie" ("The Submerged Cathedral", chosen by pianist Steven Osborne; and the last of the three orchestral Images, Rondes de printemps, chosen by composer Colin Matthews.

Today we have Debussy's last completed orchestral work, the "danced poem" Jeux; one of the three late sonatas composed as part of a projected six "sonatas for diverse instruments"; and, as promised in Friday night's preview, a taste of his only full-length opera, Pelléas et Mélisande.

FOR OUR REMAINING "IMPRESSIONS OF DEBUSSY," CLICK HERE
#

Labels: Debussy, Sunday Classics

Occupy Wall Street Hits Senegal? Printemps Arabe En Afrique?

>

A few years ago, Roland and I carefully planned out a trip to Mali-- Bamako, Ségou, Djenne, Mopti, Bandiagara, Dogon Country, and Timbuktu. We missed most of the country of course; we only had a month. But we saw a lot of Mali and a lot of variation. On the way there I stopped in Dakar for a week. I loved it and Roland decided to stop there on the way back. Were we in Senegal? Of course. Dakar is the capital and largest city (population of the metro area is almost 2.5 million). But there are over 13,000,000 people there and cosmopolitan, connected Dakar has little to do with the interior. When you've been to Kédougou, Matam, Tambacounda, Saint-Louis and Ziguinchor you can say you've seen Senegal.

So today I said to Roland, "let's forget going to Russia this summer and just hop on a plane and head for Senegal next week for a few weeks instead. There's an election coming up and I'd like to blog about it." Roland's up for anything. Lately he's been pushing Ethiopia, Namibia, a return trip to Myanmar and Laos. When I mention Paris, Tuscany, Amsterdam or anyplace where normal people want to go, he always counters with something like Tashkent or Mozambique. But he follows the news of the countries we've been to pretty closely and he was well aware that the elections I wanted to cover in Senegal were as likely as not to lead to a civil war or, at least, widespread violence. In fact, it's starting already, with rioting in the capital. Things got off to a bad start when Aboulaye Wade, the unpopular ancient despot-- age unclear-- decided he was taking the unprecedented step of running for a third term-- barring the country's most famous person, international music star Youssou N'dour, from running and barring demonstrations of an Occupy Dakar movement (Y'en a Marre, roughly, "We're Fed Up"). Friday fighting in Dakar intensified.
Senegalese police engaged in running battles with protesters firing tear gas and rubber bullets in central Dakar Friday to head off a planned protest against President Abdoulaye Wade's third-term bid.

Burning tyres, debris and rocks littered the streets around Independence Square, which police had sealed off to prevent the rally.

Riot police on trucks and foot chased protesters to prevent them from converging there, firing rubber bullets, water cannon and volleys of tear gas throughout the afternoon.

Cat-and-mouse battles continued into the night in the seaside capital, leaving several people including a western photographer and local journalist injured, AFP reporters witnessed.

A policeman was seen firing his gun during a scuffle at the Sandaga market, and an AFP journalist found a spent 9mm bullet casing in the street after protesters lobbed rocks at the police during the ongoing battles.

One police officer fell off a truck after being hit by a rock.

It was the fourth day the opposition had called for mass protests in the capital and a fresh rally has been called for Saturday.

The chaos at the market was sparked by the arrival of music superstar Youssou N'dour.

N'dour has been blocked from running in the election himself but has attended most protests and is fiercely critical of 85-year-old Wade.

Police fired tear gas at least twice at the car carrying N'dour as he was surrounded by fans and dozens of journalists.

When at one point he made as if to get out of his car a police officer in a nearby pick-up shouted at him "Get out of here" as his men launched tear gas.

Police briefly detained opposition presidential candidate Cheikh Bamba Dieye as he attempted to join the protest.

Normally bustling, central Dakar cleared out ahead of the protest Friday afternoon, with shopowners closing up and curious residents and office workers looking on from buildings lining the teargas-filled streets.

With N'dour blocked from running, the 13 opposition parties haven't settled on a consensus candidate to take on Wade, who probably has little chance to win in Dakar but can make enough promises to win in the rural hinterlands, that parts of Senegal few of us ever see. Oh, yeah, Roland said no.

Labels: Dakar, OccupyWallStreet, Senegal, Youssou N'dour

Saturday, February 18, 2012

A Republican In “Progressive†Clothing Tries To Hoodwink Voters In Illinois

>
Ilya Sheyman is the actual progressive running for Congress from IL-10

The Blue Dog/New Dem-type “Democrat†Brad Schneider’s campaign in the Illinois 10th District released a memo Thursday claiming to have a poll that shows him with a dramatic lead over progressive fighter and Blue America endorsee Ilya Sheyman with just over a month to go before the primary election. As we saw in Massachusetts with a phony poll Scott Brown pushed out showing him ahead of Elizabeth Warren, conservatives often resort to trying to game credulous media sources with fake polls.

Predictably, no journalist has seen Schneider's poll, or has any information about what questions were asked or who specifically was in the sample. Why no reporter thought it would be within the normal bounds of due diligence to review the specifics of the poll before reporting it exactly as characterized in the Schneider camp’s press release is beyond me.

So we don’t know what the poll looked like. What we do know is that Brad Schneider has sent a dozen or so mailers to Democratic voters in the past month attempting to brand him as a “progressive,†presumably to inoculate himself against the news, which ultimately will come out, that our buddy Brad has a dirty little secret.

Brad Schneider has spent the past decade pouring cash into the coffers of some of the worst anti-choice, homophobic, war-mongering Republicans Washington has to offer. Yesterday, Sheyman Campaign Manager Annie Weinberg gave the following quote to Chicago Sun-Times’ Lynn Sweet:
"Brad can try to mislead Democrats into thinking he's a progressive because his conservative ideas can't win. But whatever his poll says, the real number you need to know is 79.

"That's the percentage of voters who said in a recent Lake Research poll that Brad Schneider's history of funding far right-wing, anti-choice Republicans raised serious doubts about his candidacy.

"We've just launched an aggressive television and mail program, we've outraised Brad over the past two quarters, and with 12,000 individual donors, 500 volunteers, and a true progressive as our candidate, we've built a campaign to win that Brad can only dream of."

So why isn’t the Sheyman campaign spending it’s significant cash on hand to spread the word about Brad’s love affair with right wing Republicans?

Weinberg says the campaign is “really focused on spreading a positive message about Ilya, since he’s the only candidate in the race with a proven track record of standing up and fighting for the progressive values and policies that built the middle class in this country.â€

But, when pushed, she conceded that the Lake Research poll did indicate that "Brad’s most damaging negative is not just his numerous donations to Republican Mark Kirk over the course of several election cycles, but his long history of funding far-right Republicans year after year. These are politicians who want to privatize Social Security, defund Planned Parenthood, and end Medicare as we know it. We know that when voters hear about Brad's history of donations to these people it gives them serious reservations about voting for him. I mean, wouldn't you question the sincerity of someone who claims to be progressive but donated thousands of dollars to help Republicans take back Congress?â€

Yeah, I have a funny feeling Brad’s little poll last week didn’t ask the voters that question.

Meanwhile, Ilya is pumped up as they go into the last month of campaigning. "We’re still waiting for the final count from our finance director, Erica, but it looks like we’ve just wrapped up our strongest week of fundraising yet-- with an amazing $100,000 raised in just 10 days, and have now crossed 12,000 individual contributors!" That's what a successful grassroots campaign looks like. Schneider is running around digging up endorsements from corrupt corporate shills like defeated ex-Congressmember Melissa Bean, while Ilya engages with the community. "We're proving again and again," he wrote, "that ours is the only campaign with the broad, energized base of support it'll take to carry our progressive message through the primary election and on to defeat Republican Bob Dold. Being a community organizer, I know that elections come down to numbers, so here are a couple more I wanted to share about the unstoppable people-powered campaign we've built together:

52,000 Voters

We’ve already reached an amazing 52,000 voters at their doors, on the phones, and in their living rooms-- through dozens of coffees, meet-and-greets, and community service days-- discussing the hopes, fears, aspirations and demands for your next member of Congress.

550 Volunteers

With 31 days before our March 20th primary, we have not only launched an aggressive mail and television voter contact strategy, but we’re hitting the ground with our 550-strong team of volunteers to talk to tens of thousands of voters and get them to the polls.

His purpose has been the same since he first declared for the seat-- to "put the American people back to work, restore fairness to our economy, and invest in America again." If you'd like to help Ilya win the primary next month and go on to beat Dold in November, please consider contributing to his grassroots campaign here at the Blue America ActBlue page.

Labels: 2012 congressional races, IL-10, Illinois, Ilya Sheyman, progressives vs reactionaries

A Citizens United sequel? Do Justices Ruth and Steve know something about their Supreme Court thug-colleagues that we don't?

>
Is one of the loons in the group secretly harboring non-elitist thoughts?

by Ken

The WaPo headline is tantalizing:

Two justices suggest Citizens United ruling
should be reconsidered in Montana case


The obvious thought is that one or more of the justices responsible for the Citizens United abomination, which made it official that elective office in the U.S. belongs exclusively to the highest bidder, has been sufficiently shamed by the spectacle of the 2012 election season to date to be willing to think about doubling back on that decision's shamefully ignorant and dishonest legal gibberish.

And the Post's Robert Barnes's lead sustains this impression: "Two Supreme Court justices suggested Friday that the court reconsider its controversial 2010 decision that allowed unlimited corporate and union spending in elections."

But then the illusion seems to me to disappear.

For one thing, it came as the court was blocking a decision by the Montana Supreme Court "upholding a century-old ban on corporate campaign spending in the state."
The Montana ruling seems squarely at odds with the court's 5 to 4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which allowed unlimited corporate spending. The U.S. Supreme Court majority had said such independent spending did not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption.

In other words, the Supreme Court, in turning thumbs down on the Montana high court's ruling, was doing just what you would expect. So what's the story?
In Friday's order, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer said the upheaval in the world of campaign finance since the Citizens United decision does not bear out the majority opinion.

"Montana's experience, and experience elsewhere since this court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, make it exceedingly difficult to maintain that independent expenditures by corporations 'do not give rise to corruption or the appearance of corruption,' " Ginsburg wrote.

"A petition for certiorari [from those challenging the Montana court's decision] will give the court an opportunity to consider whether, in light of the huge sums currently deployed to buy candidates' allegiance, Citizens United should continue to hold sway."
(Barnes later explains: "Ginsburg appeared to refer to the vast amounts of money spent by super PACs that have flourished in the aftermath of Citizens United and subsequent decisions by lower courts and the FEC.")

My takeaway? Justices Ruth and Steve are whistling in the dark. Unless, that is, they know something about one of their right-wing-loon colleagues. "Slow Anthony" Kennedy, maybe? Or maybe they're just hoping that one or more of their colleagues won't have the gall to "do it again."

But I really don't think so. Not from the confident way the court slapped the Montanans down. And the right-wing bloc on the High Court has hardly shown itself lacking in gall, or especially rich in shame. Of course, as reporter Barnes points out, there's no reason to assume the court would even take the case as envisaged in the Ginsburg-Breyer proposed scenario. And even if it does, the outcome I would expect would be requiring plaintiffs who complain about the powers of the rich to pay all the court costs of their "foolishness." In the era of the Roberts Court, we know who owns access thereto.

For the record, Barnes explains:
The Montana court's action has given rise to the first challenge of the Citizens United decision. By a 5 to 2 vote, the state court upheld Montana's 1912 Corrupt Practices Act, which prohibits certain political spending by corporations.

The Montana court acknowledged the conflict with Citizens United, but Chief Justice Mike McGrath said the state was especially vulnerable to "continued efforts of corporate control to the detriment of democracy and the republican form of government."
#

Labels: Citizens United, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Supreme Court

Arizona Republican Sheriff And Congressional Candidate Paul Babeu Dragged Out Of The Closet

>

Pinal County Arizona Sheriff Paul Babeu has a reputation as a hard man-- especially hard on immigrants. Some people have claimed he's a sadist who takes delight in splitting up families and gratuitously ruining people's lives. Last week the 43 year old Babeu, now a far right Republican candidate for Congress, was the toast of CPAC. They love hard men there.

Today Mitt Romney's campaign booted Babeu from his position as a Romney for President Arizona co-chairman, reminiscent of the move his 2008 campaign did when Romney for President Idaho co-chair Larry Craig was arrested in a public toilet trying to have sex with a young-looking police undercover agent. Closeted gay Republican flock to Romney for some reason I'll never understand.

Another Romney surrogate dumped as fast as Larry Craig & Michael "Mikey Suits" Grimm

It turns out that Babeu wasn't just another garden variety, run of the mill Republican closet queen. The anti-immigrant fanatic had a long-time lover named Jose. And it gets much worse. The story was broken by a respected Arizona veteran journalist Monica Alonzo. Babeu threatened his Mexican ex-lover with deportation when the man refused to promise never to disclose their years-long relationship.
The latest of the alleged threats were made through Babeu's personal attorney, who's also running the sheriff's campaign for Congress in District 4, the ex-lover says.

He says lawyer Chris DeRose demanded he sign an agreement that he would never breathe a word about the affair. But Jose (New Times is withholding his last name because Babeu and his attorney have challenged his legal status) refused.

The 34-year-old from central Mexico charges that the sheriff's lawyer warned against mentioning the affair with Babeu. DeRose said gossip about Babeu would focus attention on Jose, attention that could result in his deportation, Jose says.

Melissa Weiss-Riner, Jose's attorney, confirms her client's account.

She says she spoke directly to the sheriff's lawyer, DeRose, about the Babeu camp's threats that Jose could be deported if he "revealed the relationship." She says DeRose falsely claimed that Jose's visa had expired.

"Jose came to our firm because he felt he was being intimidated, and he was in fear for his life," Weiss-Riner says. "He wanted his legal rights protected."

Babeu didn't respond to requests for comment by publication time for this article, but his attorney, DeRose, says the dispute between Jose and the sheriff concerned Jose's work on Babeu's websites. He says Jose was a former volunteer who hacked into a campaign website.

DeRose didn't immediately address the other claims against him and the sheriff, except to say, "I never threatened to deport anybody" and that "[Babeu's] not threatening anybody."

... Jose says he met Babeu in October 2006 on gay.com, a dating website. What started with an online invitation from Babeu for the two to get together, he says, turned into not only a personal relationship but a professional one.

Jose says he created and maintained Babeu's campaign websites, his Facebook page, and his Twitter account. Babeu didn't pay him for his online services, he claims.

Jose says Babeu told him that he loved him and was with him exclusively. But Jose suspected Babeu was lying. The relationship soured, and Jose believes that Babeu sent DeRose after him. He says DeRose demanded the passwords to Babeu's websites and social-media accounts. Jose says he complied but that Babeu and his attorney also wanted Jose to sign a document that would bind him legally to keep silent about the relationship.

Jose admits that he lashed out on news websites featuring stories about Babeu. He says he commented anonymously that the sheriff was not who people thought he was. He says he once wrote a comment on Chino Valley eNews that Babeu had an account on adam4adam.com, where gay men arrange sexual liaisons.

Jose shared text messages between him and Babeu with New Times. A September 4, 2011, text from the sheriff reads: "You can never have business after this and you will harm me and many others in the process . . . including yourself & your family."

A couple of minutes later, Babeu followed with: "And you say you have loved me? Papi... this is no good."

Meanwhile, Babeu, a former boarding school headmaster who claims he was repeatedly molested as a child by a Catholic priest, is still deluding himself that he can continue running for Congress against GOP incumbent Paul Gosar. That should be over by Monday. Babeu's press conference a couple hours ago is stunning. He admitted he's gay and tried painting himself as a victim, although he did acknowledge the relationship between himself and Jose.

[ http://eplayer.clipsyndicate.com/cs_api/iframe?pl_id=8178

Labels: Arizona, Babeu, gay Republicans, Republican hypocrisy

Do You Understand The Keystone XL Pipeline Dispute?

>

When I saw the project was being pushed-- like really vehemently pushed-- by Boehner, who, like quite a few corrupt Republicans, have personal financial stakes in it, I really got turned off and stopped wanting to learn more. Fortunately one of the congressional candidates supported by our ActBlue page, Carol Shea Porter, decided to explain it to New Hampshire voters this week. It's simple and concise and will remind you why it's so important to replace corrupt corporate shill Frank Guinta with Carol.
The Keystone XL Pipeline Fails America

by Carol Shea-Porter


The TransCanada Keystone XL (KXL) pipeline fight has been very political. How many jobs will it create? Will this hurt the environment? Will this dirty tar sand oil stay in the United States and help to make us energy independent? Is anyone buying influence to create this pipeline to carry Canadian oil across six states to the Gulf Coast? Are the Koch Brothers and their group, Americans for Prosperity, trying to influence the outcome by donating to the Energy and Commerce Committee members?

While the economy is recovering, creating jobs is crucial, so those who support this pipeline have been touting it as a job creator, although they sure seem confused. The NH-01 Congressman wrote that the KXL project, “is expected to immediately create 20,000 American jobs, and an additional 179,000 jobs through at least 2035 once the pipeline is fully operational in 2013.†Speaker John Boehner, who just happens to have major investments in most of the oil companies that will profit from the KXL and has received money from them, says 100,000 jobs. The American Petroleum Institute claims “more than half a million new jobs†by 2035. The head of the US Chamber of Commerce, Thomas Donohue, says up to 250,000 jobs over the life of the project.

There is always a party pooper, and in this case, it is the Cornell University Global Labor Institute. In September 2011, it reported, "A calculation of the direct jobs that might be created by KXL can begin with an examination of the jobs on-site to build and inspect the pipeline. The project will create no more than 2,500-4,650 temporary direct construction jobs for two years, according to TransCanada's own data supplied to the State Department." 

Will it hurt the environment, our farms and water? We can look to the past to make an intelligent prediction. The Keystone 1 project, which runs from Canada to Oklahoma, has leaked 12 times in just one year. Their spokesperson told the press that there was concern that since there were two leaks in just a month, opposing forces might use that to stop the new pipeline. In other words, their miserable record might be held against them.

But the United States does need energy, and this will help make us energy independent, right? If we were going to keep the oil here, supporters could claim some benefit. However, the oil is not promised to us. Congressman Edward Markey, in his essay, “Drill Here, Sell There, Pay More†(The Hill, 2/9/12), wrote, “Last December, I asked the president of TransCanada point-blank if he would agree to keep fuels made from oil shipped through the Keystone XL pipeline in the United States. He replied, ‘No.’†But the head of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce (which is very different from our local Chambers, which serve Main Street businesses) ignored that, and scolded President Obama in a press release: “Just as troubling, the President’s decision will make us more dependent on oil from foreign nations that don’t share our interests.â€

The Los Angeles Times, in their article, “Koch Brothers Now at Heart of GOP Power†(2/6/11) reported that their group, Americans for Prosperity, “began circulating a pledge asking politicians to denounce a Democratic-led effort to compel oil refineries and utilities to clean up emissions of greenhouse gases through a so-called cap-and-trade system… Americans for Prosperity began working to defeat House Democrats who voted for the bill, showing the power of its new activist base.†They ran ugly and false attack ads, defeated the Democrats, and now have many allies in Congress. The article also said, “Wichita-based Koch Industries and its employees formed the largest single oil and gas donor to members of the panel, ahead of giants like Exxon Mobil, contributing $279,500 to 22 of the committee's 31 Republicans, and $32,000 to five Democrats.†Did I mention that the Koch Brothers have a facility right there at the beginning of the pipeline and that their website says they are among the “largest crude oil purchasers, shippers and exporters�

So we are not getting jobs, we are risking our environment, and we don’t get to keep the oil to reduce oil imports from our enemies. Why would the United States accept this pipeline from Canada to our Gulf Coast refineries?  If the American people don’t win on this “deal,†why are we considering it-- just to help the oil companies get a better price on the world market than they could get in Canada or the United States?  As the old line says, “Go figure.â€

Or... go contribute to Carol's election campaign-- here.

UPDATE: Keystone Also Has Opponents From The Right

Corporate shills like Frank Guinta support the Keystone project because, essentially, they are nothing but corporate whore who go to work in the morning to carry out the wishes of their corporate masters. The rest is just lipstick on the pig. But, interestingly, Tea Party members are starting to see a danger in the pipeline as well-- a threat to their principles.

Property-rights conservatives, water supply activists and landowners are banding together along the pipeline’s proposed route through Texas, challenging plans to claim land for the proposed pipeline that will run from Canada’s oil sands to Texas’ Gulf Coast.

“Crippling someone’s water supply knows no party line,†said Rita Beving, consultant to the bipartisan East Texas Sub-Regional Planning Commission. A Republican mayor and a Democratic city secretary lead the group’s fight against the pipeline.

...“I could stand on the street corner and jump up and down as loud as I can. But the environmental message would only go so far,†Ian Davis, a Texas-based Sierra Club activist, told Roll Call.

The environmental group that typically draws Democratic-leaning liberals and is often at odds with conservative causes is coordinating with unusual allies in the Keystone fight. They include Debra Medina, a tea partyer who challenged Texas Gov. Rick Perry in the 2010 Republican primary and won 19 percent of the vote.

“We’ve been doing the environmental bit for years here, and nothing’s caught fire. But what [Medina] is doing has created momentum,†Davis said.

Medina and her fellow tea partyers oppose TransCanada’s use of eminent domain to claim private land for pipeline use, and they say Texas laws don’t protect landowners and city councils in the event of a spill.

Labels: Big Oil, Carol Shea-Porter, Koch Industries, New Hampshire

Iceland, Greece-- And Financial Terrorism

>


Thursday Roland asked, facetiously, whether Wolfgang Schäuble and the German and Wall Street banksters were going to make Greece sell any islands or give away naming rights to sites like the Parthenon. I'm not sure how long before Lucas Papademos persuades Athenians it wouldn't be so terrible to have a nice, tasteful neon sign up the hill that says Deutsche Bank AG begrüßt Sie auf dem mächtigen Parthenon with a proper translation for the local slaves, of course, if they're ever given a day off:


But... more street-level gangsters than the banksters, apparently aren't willing to wait. The banksters may be divvying up the isles but "armed robbers have stolen dozens of artefacts from a Greek museum dedicated to the history of the early Olympics."
Two masked men smashed display cabinets and took more than 60 objects after overpowering a guard at the museum in Olympia, officials said.

The town's mayor said the items, mostly bronze and clay statuettes, were of "incalculable" value.

Culture Minister Pavlos Geroulanos has tendered his resignation, but it has so far not been accepted.

He has gone to the site which is on a forested hilltop in western Greece.

The BBC's Mark Lowen in Athens says the robbery-- the second major museum theft this year-- raises fresh questions about museum security... Last autumn a senior member of staff at the museum wrote to the government warning that budget cuts had reduced staff there to a point where the museum's security could no longer be ensured.

...Greece's culture ministry, like most state departments, has seen its budget cut as part of austerity measures imposed by the government.

In January, a Picasso painting, given by the artist himself, was stolen from the Athens National Gallery, along with a Mondrian painting and a sketch by Italian artist Guglielmo Caccia.

A unionist with the culture minister said museums nationwide are short of some 1,500 guards, after two years of layoffs imposed by the government, according to AFP.

"All museums have suffered cuts, both in guards and archaeologists, the staff are no longer enough to operate at full shifts," said Ioanna Frangou, general secretary of the union of short-term culture ministry staff.

I bet some of the lucky ducky one-percenters who Rumsfeld and Bush let acquire the ancient treasures of Babylon and Ur will provide wonderful homes in London, Berlin, Dallas and New York for these awesome treasures as well. But while Greece unravels-- whether in an orderly or disorderly fashion, no one seems to know-- there is news of an alternative to the Austerity regime that the German and Wall Street criminals are pushing as "inevitable." Iceland, as Tyler Durden put it yesterday, "is winning."
While Greece and Europe continue sinking ever deeper into the colonial quicksand of Pax Goldmania, Iceland, which blew up, pushed its banks into bankruptcy, and arrested its corrupt bankers, is well on its way to being the world's only normal country.

• ICELAND RATINGS RAISED TO INVESTMENT GRADE BY FITCH

• FITCH UPGRADES ICELAND TO 'BBB-'; STABLE OUTLOOK

• FITCH DOES NOT EXPECT ICELAND TO SLIP BACK INTO RECESSION

• FITCH SAYS ICELAND GOVERNMENT DEBT PEAKED AT 100% OF GDP IN '11


Too bad the Goldman colony of Greece (and soon everyone else - thank you first lien "bailout" debt) will not see headlines such as these written about it any time in the next century.

The news is out there, but no one is trumpeting it from Wall Street's or Berlin's parapets. Dow reported it, quietly yesterday:
Fitch Ratings lifted its rating on Iceland to investment grade, citing the nation's progress in stabilizing its economy and pushing ahead with structural reforms.

The upgrade puts Iceland's long-term foreign currency issuer default rating at triple-B-minus, placing it on the first rung of investment-grade territory. The outlook is stable.

As one of the first countries to take a hit from the global financial crisis, the country is now showing a "promising" economic recovery, said Paul Rawkins, a senior director at the ratings firm.

He added that Iceland has successfully completed a program with the International Monetary Fund and gained renewed access to international capital markets.

Fitch believes that Iceland's gross general government debt may have peaked at around 100% of GDP in 2011, while net debt is significantly lower at around 65% of GDP.

Excluding the possibility for further shocks, the firm said Iceland should see a reduction in its public debt to GDP ratio, assuming its economic recovery continues to progress and fiscal targets are adhered to by the government.

Fellow ratings firm Standard & Poor's Ratings Services last year raised its outlook on Iceland to stable from negative, pointing to the country's improved economic fundamentals and growth expectations.


[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/3nEU5BDytL8 ]

Labels: austerity, banksters, European Union, Greece, Iceland

Friday, February 17, 2012

Sunday Classics preview: More Debussy -- a quick entrée into one of the truly unique pieces in the musical literature

>
[A]

[B]
[ http://www.archive.org/embed/PelleasEtMelisandeOpeningansermet ]
[C]

[D]
[ http://www.archive.org/embed/PelleasEtMelisandeOpeningabbado ]
(Apologies for the surface noise in [A], which you'll no doubt realize comes from an LP.)

by Ken

This week we're finishing up the series we began last week of "Impressions of Debussy," works chosen by nine musicians canvassed by BBC Music Magazine as being especially personal to them, as part of the magazine's celebration of the composer's 150th birthday. In this week's group we're going to have just the tiniest tease of one of the central works of Debussy's output, one that stands pretty much alone in the musical literature.

We recently had occasion to listen to the one-of-a-kind brief orchestral prelude to Wagner's Siegfried, which I described as "perhaps the most eerily wonderful music I know." Now we're going to hear an even briefer orchestral introduction, also almost otherworldly-ly mysterious-sounding and I think equally arresting. By coincidence or not, it too prepares us for a mysterious forest setting.

Don't worry if you don't know what the piece is; I'll identify it in the click-through. I thought, though, that you might enjoy trying to identify the conductors, from the following list:

Claudio Abbado
Ernest Ansermet
Pierre Boulez
Herbert von Karajan

There's a wrinkle. While this little list accounts for all four of our clips, I can't swear that all four conductors are actually to be heard here.

FOR THE ANSWERS, AND MORE OF THE SCENE
THAT'S INTRODUCED BY THIS MUSIC, CLICK HERE

#

Labels: Debussy, Sunday Classics

Gary Carter (1954-2012) -- not just for baseball fans, I think

>
"Gary Carter was often seen hugging somebody," George Vecsey writes. "It was easy to joke about that. The best hug of all was with Jesse Orosco at the end of the 1986 World Series."

"Up close, Carter was not nearly so ebullient. He was a gentleman, the eternal optimist, but there was also an element of sadness to him."
-- from NYT sports columnist George Vecsey's remembrance,
"A Star With a Smile, Forever Kid"

by Ken

It's that sadness George Vecsey writes about, a sadness that I -- as a fan who saw him play a lot -- didn't know about, that's taken me by surprise and made Gary Carter's passing a lot more painful than I expected. And that passing was, alas, all too expected. Carter had been waging a protracted struggle, apparently as excruciating as it was doomed, against brain cancer.

Even now, at least as of this evening, a poignant "Dear Fans" note still sppears on The Official Website of Gary Carter, warning that, "due to Gary's current condition," they "cannot guarantee fulfillment of any requests" with regard to "mailed in memorabilia items [for signing, that is] and also online orders." There's also an address for the Gary Carter Foundation, for "anyone wishing to send get well wishes or messages to Gary."

To fans, the Kid was always hard-nosed (he played the game's most grueling position tough) but confident and ebullient. And also, in his New York years, as Vecsey notes, somewhat distant. On that great 1986 Mets team, he does seem to have made the choice not to try to compete for dominance with that rosterful of dominant personalities, which represented something of a 180-degree shift in his athletic personality. He sometimes seemed more a strategic ally than a teammate, and it's probably nobody's fault -- just the way things likely had to be for that combination of players in that situation at that time.

He was a great player. Here are some numbers from Wikipedia, to go with the 324 career HRs and 1225 RBIs: 11-time All-Star (and 2-time game MVP), 3-time Gold Glove winner (he was a great defensive catcher), 5-time Silver Slugger winner. But he was something more -- something that's hard to put your finger on, some kind of presence, always intense, always physical, and always smiling. I'm thinking, he knew he was good, knew how good he was, and knew that it came from a combination of outsize physical ability and enormously hard work and intensity, and he accepted responsibility for producing, for being as good on the field, day in and day out, as he thought he was.

Which also means, I guess, that fans had an image of him as being kind of full of himself, an image that seems seriously unfair in George Vecsey's telling: "Carter was as sweet a person as you could meet in that highly competitive world."
SPORTS OF THE TIMES
A Star With a Smile, Forever Kid

Gary Carter in the Mets' clubhouse at Shea Stadium in 1986. It was his second season in New York, and his most memorable.

By GEORGE VECSEY

The players called him Kid. Some fans and reporters called him Camera Carter.

The mask would come off, and the cameras would pick up his radiant smile.

When the Mets were on their run in the 1980s, Gary Carter was often seen hugging somebody. It was easy to joke about that. The best hug of all was with Jesse Orosco at the end of the 1986 World Series.

Up close, Carter was not nearly so ebullient. He was a gentleman, the eternal optimist, but there was also an element of sadness to him. He never brought it up, unless asked, but his mother died of leukemia when he was 12 years old.

According to an old Jim Murray column, Inge Charlotte Carter told him she was going into the hospital for tests; she didn't want him to worry. He found out while he was on the ball field that she had died, Carter once told Murray, the great columnist from The Los Angeles Times.

The grief remained tangible with Carter when he was the final addition for the championship run of the Mets, the way Dave DeBusschere had been for the 1969-70 Knicks. DeBusschere died of a heart attack in 2003 at 62, and on Thursday the other great New York building block died of brain cancer at 57.

At a distance, Kid Carter looked like a cheerleader who could hit home runs and throw out runners at second base. He was more complicated than that.

For a man who had nothing bad to say or do toward anybody, he was strangely alone in the Mets' clubhouse. In Montreal he had been the core of the Expos, but General Manager Frank Cashen and his Mets staff had accumulated so many strong personalities on the Mets that Carter was muted.

When a pitcher needed a lecture, it usually came from Keith Hernandez, making a fist from first base: Settle down or I'll kill you. When a fight was needed, Ray Knight would oblige, willingly. Straw and Doc, Nails and Wally, Roger and Bobby O.

In New York, Kid Carter was pure vanilla for a city with stronger tastes.

But Carter and Mookie Wilson were the nicest people. That needs to be said. Carter played with the enthusiasm of the 12-year-old he had been when his mother died. He and his brother had helped their father run the house. He was used to responsibility. He did not need to assert himself.

Gary Carter was also a Christian who lived his faith, but did not openly profess it. If people asked, he shared, but he did not threaten that highly secular clubhouse. If somebody whispered, "Geez, I love Kid, but why can't he hit the ball to the right side?" Carter turned the other cheek, always seeing the best in people, and in his team.

Some religious guys in sports give the impression: I've got something you don't have. Carter was as sweet a person as you could meet in that highly competitive world. He made the Mets better the day he arrived.

Carter must have known how some of the most talented people in that clubhouse were dissipating their skills. He never let on. He was a true believer, even when doctors told him he had inoperable brain cancer.

Now he gets to see his mom, and she tells him how proud she is.

It's also definitely worth checking out the blogpost by NYT baseball writer Tyler Kepner from this past January 19, which Vecsey references via the "Christian who lived his faith" link, written on the heels of the family's announcement of a grievous turn for the worse in Carter's already-grievous condition. It was being described then as "extremely grave," with doctors "deciding whether to continue his cancer treatments."
It is heartbreaking, of course, as it would be for anyone fighting for his life at age 57. It also makes me wish I had known Carter better. By all accounts, he is gracious and kind, an antidote to the gruff, hard-living Mets of his era. He is also religious, and you have to believe that is helping to comfort him now.

Carter's faith stands out from my only real memory of meeting him. It was in the early 1990s, and I was writing a story about the famous sixth game against the Red Sox in that 1986 World Series. Carter, as Mets fans surely remember, came up with two outs and the bases empty, down two runs to Boston in the bottom of the 10th inning. One more out, and the Red Sox would be champions. I asked Carter to relive the moment.

"The biggest thing that was going through my mind is that I reflected back upon my days in the alleyway dreaming about this," Carter said. "You always think World Series, bottom of the ninth, two outs, that kind of stuff.

"And then, I felt an extreme presence and I knew that our good Lord was with us. I felt like when I went up to the plate, I was not going to make the last out. I prayed from the time I left the on-deck circle to the time I got in the box."

Carter lashed a single off Calvin Schiraldi, scored on a single by Ray Knight, and celebrated – in shin guards and chest protector -- when the Mets capped their comeback.

The next game, Carter squeezed the final strike when Jesse Orosco fanned Marty Barrett to clinch Game 7. Carter thrust his arms in the air, raced to the mound and leaped on Orosco to start the most raucous dogpile baseball had ever seen. It is how Mets fans will remember him, a champion on top of the pile.

Nobody knows what God had to do with it. But Carter believed, and that seems important now.
#

GOP's Animal Farm War Against Regulations Is Toxic

>

First, here's how their war on regulations isn't toxic, just annoying. Have you ever been on the phone-- or in the middle of something important-- when you've been interrupted by a robocall? I signed up for that national opt out thing the GOP was so against and for a few years the number of annoying calls went way down. Now they're up again-- from robocalls. Republicans don't like the idea of telling businesses what they can or can't do. You need to dump toxic wastes into public drinking water to make a better profit-- well, of course you can. That's part of the American way-- or at least the Ayn Rand-Paul Ryan American way. As for the annoying robocalls, it looks like the FCC is getting enough pressure from irate voters to fix the loophole Republicans put in the rule.
The rule changes adopted at Wednesday's open meeting would make it more difficult for telemarketers to disturb consumers, by requiring consent before they can place automated robocalls to a home phone line. A previous exemption to the rule for established business relationships was also eliminated.

The rules also require telemarketers to provide consumers with an automated opt-out mechanism so they can stop receiving the calls, and limit the total number of dropped or "dead air" calls a firm can make within each calling campaign.

"Too many telemarketers, aided by autodialers and prerecorded messages, have continued to call consumers who don’t want to hear from them," said FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. 

"Consumers by the thousands have complained to us, letting us know that they remain unhappy with having their privacy invaded and their time wasted by these unwanted calls."

Toxic, however, is a story I heard about on the radio yesterday-- a crime severely in need of some regulations and enforcement. It's the story of fake Avastin on the U.S. market. The GOP's Law-of-the-Jungle/only-the-strong-survive "free market" capitalism postulates that a product that kills people will turn off consumers and they'll stop purchasing it and the culprit will go out of business and the whole world will be a happier, gayer place. Republicans are, clearly, insane and dangerous to normal people.
The maker of the widely used Avastin cancer drug said Tuesday that it is warning doctors, hospitals and patient groups that a counterfeit version of the medicine has been found in the U.S.

Tests of counterfeit vials of Avastin showed that they didn't contain the active ingredient in Roche Holding AG's intravenous drug, according to the Swiss company's Genentech unit.

It isn't clear how much of the counterfeit product was distributed in the U.S. or whether it has caused any harm. A Genentech spokeswoman said the company doesn't know if any patients were given the fake drug.

The Food and Drug Administration is investigating, and has sent letters to 19 medical practices in the U.S. that the agency says buy unapproved cancer medicines and might have bought the counterfeit Avastin.

An FDA spokeswoman said it hasn't received any reports of patient side effects that appear to be linked to the counterfeit product.

Most Americans don't question the integrity of the drugs they rely on. They view drug counterfeiting, if they are aware of it at all, as a problem for developing countries. But the latest incident, which follows the appearance of other fake drugs in the U.S.-- including counterfeits of the weight-loss treatment Alli and the influenza treatment Tamiflu-- suggests it is a growing risk, especially as more medicines and drug ingredients sold in the U.S. are made overseas.

In addition to the specter of fake medicines, U.S. drug makers are confronting their own shortcomings. Companies including Johnson & Johnson have had to shut down manufacturing plants due to quality problems. Earlier this month, Pfizer Inc. said it recalled about a million packs of birth-control pills because improper packaging could raise the risk of unplanned pregnancies.

...Experts say counterfeits are a relatively small but still serious problem for the nation's drug supply. In the U.S., most prescription medicines are distributed by authorized suppliers, who buy them from their manufacturers and assure their integrity. Pharmacies, too, put pressure on the distributors to ensure quality.

Still counterfeits can enter the drug supply through unauthorized distributors and Internet pharmacies that try to turn a quick profit selling the inauthentic products. Doctors and patients might not know they are using a counterfeit if it doesn't cause harm but simply fails to work.

This is the crackpot the entire GOP is based on:

Labels: Ayn Rand, federal regulatory agencies, robocalls

Our Political Elites Shouldn't Be Poisoning Us So Private Companies Can Make Fatter Profits

>
[ http://www.youtube.com/embed/s-Xl17B-Z0A ]

Long before he ever reared his head as a politician, DWT came across dirty FBI agent/crime figure, "Mikey Suits" as part of our investigation into organized crime figure "Gus" Kontogiannis and Duke Cunningham. Today "Mikey Suits" is the Republican/Tea party freshman congressman from Staten Island, famous for financing his campaign almost entirely with illegal foreign contributions-- and for urging Boehner to allow Members of Congress to pack heat. But it wasn't until yesterday's general exposé of Grimm in the NY Times as a mobster-related businessman that I found out this one-man crime wave has also been involved in... health food.
Twelve years later, Mr. Grimm was back in business in New York, where he formed a company called Granny Sayz, L.L.C., which operated Healthalicious, a restaurant on Second Avenue near 83rd Street in Manhattan. The company was affiliated with a company now connected to Mr. Biton, the Grimm fund-raiser who is under investigation.

The New York State Workers’ Compensation Board last month ordered Healthalicious to pay $88,000 for not carrying workers’ compensation insurance. And in 2011, two former deliverymen retained a lawyer, Dan Knauth, asserting that the restaurant had paid them less than minimum wage, did not pay for work beyond 40 hours per week and paid cash to evade scrutiny.

Mr. Knauth said he contacted Mr. Grimm’s office about the complaints. Shortly afterward, Mr. Grimm filed papers with the state to dissolve his company, Granny Sayz.

On Dec. 1, the deliverymen sued the restaurant, Mr. Grimm and others.

The defendants have not responded in court. But the restaurant has engaged in maneuvers that make it more difficult to sue.

The restaurant’s legal name originally contained the word Healthalicious, with a C. Then in 2010, it was changed to Healthalitious NYC (with a T).

Finally, right after the lawsuit was filed, the restaurant changed its legal name again, to Healthalicious Upper East Side-- with a C.

It freaks me out that right-wing crooks like Grimm (and Romney national finance co-chair Frank VanderSloot, the billionaire crook behind Melaleuca) gravitate to selling bogus health products to an unsuspecting public. Is it any wonder their opposition to regulations goes beyond hysteria? Glenn Greenwald exposed VanderSloot at Salon this morning. Grimm's restaurant, long on the verge of bankruptcy has almost nothing to do with "health" other than the hype and, in fact, earned at least 30 healthcode violations. It isn't uncommon for criminal minds to sell conventionally grown food as "organic" and, knowing Grimm's shay dealings and crooked past, there's no question that I would fast before eating anything that came out of Healthalicious. But crooks like Michael Grimm-- whether part of organized crime of the petty-ante stuff-- isn't the biggest threat to the organic food movement at the moment.

Willie Nelson, President of Farm Aid, warns that “Corporate control of our food system has led to the loss of millions of family farmers, destruction of our soil…†and he's calling for the national Occupy movement to declare an “Occupy  the Food System†action.
Hundreds of citizens, (even including NYC chefs in their white chef hats) joined Occupy the Food System groups, ie Food Democracy Now, gathered outside the Federal Courts in Manhattan on  January 31st, to support organic family farmers in their landmark lawsuit against Big Agribusiness giant Monsanto. (Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association v. Monsanto) Oral arguments were heard that day concerning the lawsuit by 83 plaintiffs representing over 300,000 organic farmers, organic seed growers, and organic seed businesses.

The lawsuit addresses the bizarre and shocking issue of Monsanto harassing and threatening organic farmers with lawsuits of “patent infringement†if any organic farmer ends up with any trace amount of GM seeds on their organic farmland.

Judge Naomi Buckwald heard the oral arguments on Monsanto’s Motion to Dismiss, and the legal team from Public Patent Foundation represented the rights of American organic farmers against Monsanto, maker of GM seeds, [and additionally, Agent Orange, dioxin, etc.]

After hearing the arguments, Judge Buckwald stated that on March 31st she will hand down her decision on whether the lawsuit will move forward to trial.

Not only does this lawsuit debate the issue of Monsanto potentially ruining the organic farmers’ pure seeds and crops with the introduction of Monsanto’s genetically modified (GM) seeds anywhere near the organic farms, but additionally any nearby GM fields can withstand Monsanto’s Roundup herbicides, thus possibly further contaminating the organic farms nearby if Roundup is used.


Of course, the organic farmers don’t want anything to do with that ole contaminated GM seed in the first place. In fact, that is why they are certified organic farmers.  Hello?  But now they have to worry about getting sued by the very monster they abhor,  and even have to spend extra money and land (for buffers which only sometimes deter the contaminated seed from being swept by the wind into their crop land). At this point, they are even having to resort to not growing at all the following organic plants: soybeans, corn, cotton, sugar beets, and canola, …just to protect themselves from having any (unwanted) plant that Monsanto could possibly sue them over.

The farmers are suffering the threat of possible loss of Right Livelihood. They are creating good jobs for Americans, and supplying our purest foods. These organic farmers are bringing Americans healthy food so we can be a healthy Nation, instead of the undernourished and obese kids and adults that President Obama worries so much about us becoming.

So what was President Obama doing when he appointed Michael Taylor, a former VP of Monsanto, as Sr. Advisor to the Commissioner at the FDA? The FDA is responsible for “label requirements†and recently ruled under Michael Taylor’s time as FDA Food Czar that GMO products did not need to be labeled as such, even though national consumer groups loudly professed the public’s right to know what is genetically modified in the food system. Sadly to remember: President Obama promised in campaign speeches that he would “let folks know what foods are genetically modified.â€Â These are the conflict of interests that lead to the 99% movement standing up for the family farmers.

...Jim Gerritsen, President of the Organic Seed Growers and Trade Association, has pointed out that there are 5th and 6th generation family farmers being pushed off their farms today, and because of a “climate of fear†(from possible lawsuits from Monsanto), they can’t grow some of the food they want to grow.

These farmers are the ones who have been able to survive the changes over the past twenty years by choosing to go into the budding niche of organic farming.  Now look at what they have to deal with while trying to grow successful businesses: Monsanto’s threats.

Even organic dairy farmers have had to suffer lawsuits ( from Monsanto) when they labeled their organic milk “non-BGH†referring to Monsanto’s bovine growth hormone used by conventional dairies.

Consumers want organic food, and they want America’s pure food source to stay protected in America.  Made in America, organically, is the way of the future, and family farmers and seed businesses should be free to maintain their high standards for organic foods.  They deserve protection from Big Agribusiness’ dangerous seeds trespassing on their croplands, not to mention the use of pesticides and herbicides on GM crops.  The organic industry has an “organic seal†which is also important to the success of family businesses, and even that stamp of quality is threatened by the spread of Monsanto’s GM seed contaminating their pure seed banks.

...It was so inspiring years ago when Michelle Obama planted an organic garden at the White House. It was a great precedent for the future, but what happened? It was ruined when they discovered sewer sludge from previous Administrations had contaminated their beautiful soil where the organic vegetables were planted. Just one small upset but it was remedied for future plantings. What about our whole country’s organic food supply being contaminated by previous Adminstrations’ bad choices? Why did they ever allow Monsanto to introduce genetically engineered seeds into our pure, organic, and heirloom stockpiles across America in the first place?

Recently, the Obama Administration, in an effort to boost food exports, signed joint agreements with agricultural biotechnology industry giants, including Monsanto, to remove the last barriers for the spread of more genetically modified crops.

But in this recent lawsuit filed by the Organic Seed Growers & Trade Association, it was argued that a previous contamination of a “genetically engineered variety of rice,†named Liberty Link 601, in 2006, before it was approved for human consumption, “extensively contaminated the commercial rice supply, resulting in multiple countries banning the import of U.S. rice.â€Â The worldwide economic loss was “upward to $1.285 billion dollars†due to the presence of GMOs…

What are everyday Americans going to do to turn it around, to get rid of Monsanto’s genetically modified seeds and its dangerous threat to America’s heirloom and organic seed caches?

There is high rate of cancer in America, and eating healthier, especially organic foods, has been shown to have great benefits in beating cancer and other diseases.  When we have Agribusiness threatening independent family farmers, which leads to the farmers feeling so scared that they don’t even plant their organic crops that Americans need, then perhaps we can all see what the 99% Occupy Movement is trying to say about their conflict of interest and seemingly abuse of powers.

Willie Nelson just released a new poem on You Tube: “We stand with Humanity, against the Insanity, We’re the ones we’ve been waiting for… We’re the Seeds and we’re the Core,  We’re the ones we’ve been waiting for; We’re the ones with the 99%.â€

Monsanto’s practices are a clear example of the wrong direction that the 99% want our country to go in. How about shining some light on Monsanto, and before it is too late, realize the dangers of genetically modified seeds which are contaminating the world’s food supply.

“Crazy, crazy for feeling so…  99%.


Labels: Michael Grimm, organic food, Willie Nelson

Chris Larson (D-WI) On ALEC: "If They Look Like A Lobbyist, Talk Like A Lobbyist And Walk Like A Lobbyist, They Should Be Regulated Like A Lobbyistâ€

>

Two of the Wisconsin legislature's best members-- one from the Assembly, Mark Pocan, and one from the Senate, Chris Larson-- have teamed up to pull back the curtains of one of America's most insidious and dangerous anti-democract groups, the Koch-backed American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC). ALEC works with crackpots, extremists, racists and fascists in state legislatures wherever the Republicans have seized control. Their agenda is to undermine and discredit democracy itself on behalf of the one percent. Although the ALEC agenda dominates every legislature in the Old Confederacy, since 2010 they have also gained control in normal states as well, particularly Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. Monday Pocan and Larson formally submitted a bill to clamp down on special interest organizations that write bills for legislators, ALEC's M.O.
Recently, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) has drawn criticism for acting as lobbyists for corporate legislation while being exempted from registering as a lobbying group with the Government Accountability Board. Many ALEC bills became law this session, including several of Governor Walker’s special session bills that made it harder for victims to sue corporations for wrongdoing.

“Last August, I infiltrated the ALEC convention and got a first-hand look at what they are up to,†said Pocan. “ALEC is like a speed dating service for lonely legislators and corporate executives. The corporations write bills and legislators sign their names to the bills. In the end, we’re stuck with bad laws and nobody knows where they came from.â€

During one of Governor Walker’s special sessions, which were supposed to focus on job creation, ALEC saw several of their bills become law in Wisconsin. One such bill diminishes a victim’s right to sue corporations if they are harmed by irresponsible business practices.

“If they look like a lobbyist, talk like a lobbyist and walk like a lobbyist, they should be regulated like a lobbyist,†said Larson. “Wisconsin’s lobbying laws are intended to instill as much integrity and transparency in our government as possible. ALEC shouldn’t get a free pass to anonymously do their lobbying.â€

Pocan has crashed ALEC’s conventions twice, becoming a member in an effort to learn more about the secretive lobbying group. In doing so, he exposed a giant loophole in Wisconsin’s lobbying law in which corporations do not have to report their efforts to persuade legislators to sponsor their personally crafted model legislation.

The ALEC Accountability Act would apply existing lobbying laws to any organization or person who advocates for the introduction of model legislation. The bill would also regulate the reporting of any “scholarships†organizations dole out to legislators, including a list of corporate sponsors. Additionally, the bill would prohibit state taxpayer funds from being used to pay for these lobbyist conventions.

It's a start-- in one state. And speaking of one state-- Wisconsin will be electing much of its state legislature again this year and Chris Larson is running for reelection in the suburbs south of Milwaukee. If you'd like to help him win, you'll find him on the page with America's most progressive and effective state legislators-- right here.

Labels: ALEC, Chris Larson, lobbyists, Wisconsin


You are viewing a mobilized version of this site...
View original page here

Mobilized by Mowser Mowser